How can an administration that gives guns to criminals, resulting in the murder of a U.S. Border Patrol agent, have any credibility in a gun-ban debate?
How can an administration that disarms those securing our consulate in Benghazi, Libya, resulting in the assassination of our ambassador and three others, have any credibility in demanding that its citizens, whom it is constitutionally bound to protect, be made vulnerable by denying their Second Amendment rights?
Criminals always will be able to get their hands on guns. Law-abiding citizens will be at their mercy.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.