You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

KEENE: Armed security is common sense

Sandy Hook shows need for heightened protection of schoolchildren

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Washington's ideological blinders too often prevent anything approaching a rational discussion of issues. The battle lines are drawn and most everybody assumes without thinking that any suggestion emanating from "enemy" lines must be dangerous, wrong or even crazy.

In response to Columbine, then-President Bill Clinton and a Democratic Congress enacted a program called Cops in Schools. Today, 23,000 public and private U.S. schools provide armed security for our children. Yet when National Rifle Association (NRA) Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre suggested that armed security officers in our nation's schools would help prevent the next Newtown, he was greeted immediately and unthinkingly with derision and hostility. A New York rag called him the "Craziest man in America"; New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie dismissed the idea out of hand, and teachers' unions went berserk about any hint that their members could protect their young charges.

The idea was brusquely dismissed out of hand as too costly by some liberals and derided by others as an overreaction to the Connecticut shootings. One school "security expert" said it would be money and effort wasted because such incidents are so rare that guarding against them isn't worth the effort. Much of this comes, of course, from the same folks who say we just need another gun law or two and that school shootings justify gutting the Second Amendment.

Away from the madding crowd, not everyone rejects the idea simply because the NRA suggested it. Mr. Christie was dismissive immediately, but the head of school security in Camden, N.J., must not have heard his governor's comments before telling a reporter that he thought providing armed security was a good idea. Democratic California Sen. Barbara Boxer announced that she favors putting armed National Guardsmen in our schools. Mrs. Boxer's far more radical suggestion caused barely any media ripple.

President Obama and others say they want a "conversation" about how to prevent another Newtown, but it appears that to them, such a conversation should focus mainly on firearms restrictions through a renewal of the discredited Clinton-era "assault weapons" ban, which was sunset because even police agreed it had no effect on crime and violence. This proposal and others like it may make people feel that they've "done something," but they won't prevent the next Newtown. A rational conversation focusing on protecting our children would be far more useful and in keeping with the needs and desires of the American public. Such a "conversation" would involve a serious discussion of the failings of our current mental health system and the role of violent videos and computer games in pushing borderline personality types over the edge.

This is not to say everyone with a mental health problem is a potential killer or that any kid who plays one of today's popular graphic war games is about to take up a gun and kill his mother, but it is to say that we need to address these areas of concern if we want to deal with the sorts of mass shootings that, while rare, have become more common in recent decades.

These are problems the NRA has never ignored. As president of the NRA in the 1990s, the late Charlton Heston addressed violence in music and video productions. As long ago as 1966, the NRA was urging action to bar those with mental problems from owning guns. In the decades since, little has been done to improve the treatment of the potentially dangerous mentally ill or to include those who have been adjudicated mentally ill on the national registry of people prohibited from purchasing firearms.

These are serious and complicated questions that must be addressed if we are to keep our children safe, but none of them will be solved overnight. That's why it makes all the sense in the world to provide armed security for our children. As Mr. LaPierre told NBC's David Gregory during a "Meet the Press" interview on Sunday, "If it's crazy to call for putting police and armed security in our schools to protect our children, then call me crazy."

David A. Keene is president of the National Rifle Association of America.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts