Firmly sticking to its goal of raising taxes on high-earners, the White House on Monday used some of its strongest language to date in the ongoing “fiscal cliff” debate with Republicans, who contend President Obama is not negotiating in good faith.
The White House also all but claimed an election mandate for tax increases on high earners, with Mr. Carney arguing that Mr. Obama made no bones about his goal in speech after speech during the campaign.
“This should not be news to anyone who was not in a coma during the campaign season,” Mr. Carney said.
In order to achieve substantial deficit reduction, Mr. Carney argued, tax rates on high earners will have to go up.
“It is mathematically impossible to reach a balance … in a way that only closes loopholes and caps deductions,” Mr. Carney said. “It’s possible to do it if you stick the middle class and raise taxes on the middle class.”
Mr. Carney’s clear-cut statement came on a day in which both sides dug in and the talks to avert tax hikes on most Americans and across-the-board spending cuts appeared at a standstill despite a looming Dec. 31 deadline.
Republicans over the weekend argued that Mr. Obama was simply recycling his own previously rejected budget proposals and is not offering any new negotiating points or even the smallest concessions. While a handful of Republicans have begun to support the president’s plan to raise tax rates on households with annual incomes above $250,000, GOP leaders so far have rejected that threshold and have called for the closing of tax loopholes and some deductions to come up with savings.
Grover Norquist, the head of Americans for Tax Reform and the father of the group’s influential “no-new-taxes” pledge, also has urged Republicans to keep hitting Democrats and the White House on their reluctance to cut entitlement programs.
But Mr. Carney said that so far, Republicans haven’t made a counteroffer to Mr. Obama’s proposal and should lay out a detailed plan if they find Mr. Obama’s offer of a $1.6 trillion tax hike unworkable.
“If they have ideas that are different than ours … we can’t guess what they are,” he said. “They have to tell us.”
Mr. Carney also flatly rejected a so-called “doomsday” plan as “entirely unacceptable” even though the plan would follow a White House recommendation to extend middle-class tax rates while allowing rates on top earners to increase.
Under the doomsday scenario, House Republicans would allow Senate Democrats to pass a bill extending the Bush-era tax rates for incomes below $250,000 while increasing taxes on income above that level.
Republicans then would pass a bill that would not extend the debt ceiling or unemployment benefits, nor would it avoid $1.1 trillion in slated spending cuts to defense and domestic budgets set to begin next year.
Theoretically, the move would force the president back to the the negotiating table early next year and would give Republicans more leverage.View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
Susan Crabtree is an award-winning investigative reporter with more than 15 years of reporting experience in Washington, D.C. Her reporting about bribery, corruption and conflict-of-interest issues on Capitol Hill has led to several FBI and ethics investigations, as well as consequences for members within their caucuses and at the ballot box. Susan can be reached at email@example.com.
By Rand Paul
Obama acts as though we no longer have a Constitution
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
First over-the-counter column approved for fast and effective relief from even your worst media-induced headache.
Contributions to the Communities Sports desk from readers.
Happiness is attainable. Morning to night. I love to teach, deal with folks that have an issue and really wish to tackle it and write.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc