- Shoe-bomb witness to speak from London at N.Y. trial
- New evidence could threaten Army sex assault case
- George Zimmerman signs autographs at Orlando gun show
- GOP lawmaker faces fire for NBA crime tweet
- Taliban vow to ‘use all force’ to disrupt Afghan elections
- Atheists sue to remove ‘Ground Zero Cross’ from 9/11 museum
- Bishop in Aleppo: ‘We Christians live in fear in Syria’
- Oscar Pistorius vomits during graphic testimony
- Toronto Mayor Rob Ford flubs daylight saving time advice: ‘Turn your clocks back’
- Americans don’t support sending U.S. troops to Ukraine
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Postal service changing for the better
Your editorial “The mailman vs. FedEx” (Nov. 27) mischaracterizes the U.S. Postal Service’s ability to compete with the private sector and falsely asserts we are maintaining overly high staffing levels.
Your description of the Postal Service’s staffing levels as “bloated” is wrong. We have reduced staffing levels by 280,000 positions over the past decade — a 35 percent drop — and the Postal Service will shave an additional 40,000 positions this year alone. These reductions are greater than those of any major private-sector company in America over a similar period.
However, staffing reductions alone will not help the Postal Service achieve profitability. The postmaster general has not urged Congress to allow us to underfund the pensions of postal workers. Instead, he has asked to change the payment structure for pre-funding retirement health care to simply establish a fair and reasonable payment schedule and allow the Postal Service to move away from six-day delivery of mail. That would add up to approximately $8 billion annually, putting the Postal Service on the road to profitability.
The Postal Service is committed to building and driving strategic relationships to improve our customers’ experience. Our latest innovative test product is a same-day delivery service named Metro Post, which seeks to capitalize on the rapid growth in e-commerce.
Finally, your editorial suggested opening up the mailbox to competition by eliminating a 140-year-old statute. The private sector already enjoys a competitive advantage, and relaxing access to the mailbox would pose security concerns, increase delivery costs and ultimately hurt customer service for a trusted and affordable universal service to the American public.
The Postal Service receives no taxpayer funding. It operates entirely from revenues derived from the sale of postage, and we want to keep it that way. The Postal Service will continue to expand its relevance in a digital society, ensure it remains at the heart of an $800 billion mailing industry that employs 8 million people and endures as a vital driver of the American economy.
RONALD A. STROMAN
Deputy Postmaster General
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- CURL: Today's GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- Mitch McConnell on beating tea party: 'We are going to crush them'
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Arrest made in Ohio bar shooting that killed 3
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
- As Crimea falls, Obama takes Key Largo golf vacation, Biden hits Virgin Islands
- Charges filed against accused 'shadow campaign' financier
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults