- The Washington Times - Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Two things you need to know about President Obama’s nearly $4 trillion budget for fiscal 2013: It will likely add another $1 trillion to a $15.3 trillion debt, and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid says he will not act on any full budget plan this year.

The first tells us that Mr. Obama’s recklessly irresponsible tax, spend and borrow policies will push the U.S. dangerously closer to the brink of fiscal insolvency.

The second is proof positive that the highest-ranking Democrat in Congress is blocking any action on its No. 1 fiscal responsibility under the United States Constitution.

In other words, Mr. Obama’s budget is dead on arrival, not at the hands of the Republicans, but as a result of his own party, which has not passed a budget in three straight years and won’t pass this one, either.


If Mr. Obama campaigns around the country this year as he has promised, railing against a “do-nothing” Congress blocking action on his agenda, Mr. Reid and his gang of accomplices in the Senate will be the chief culprits.

House Republican leaders have already announced they will be sending a budget to the Senate for consideration, but Mr. Reid is on record saying the Senate does not need to pass a budget and he has no intention of bringing Mr. Obama’s plan up for a vote.

Federal Reserve Board Chairman Ben S. Bernanke has testified recently that Congress‘ failure to pass a budget throughout the economic recession we have endured has had a very negative impact on economic growth because of the uncertainty it has created in the economy.

ABC News White House correspondent Jake Tapper questioned presidential press secretary Jay Carney about this last week, asking, “Who does the president think is right, Harry Reid or Ben Bernanke?”

Mr. Carney hemmed and hawed, saying, “I don’t have an opinion to express on how the Senate does its business with regards to this issue.” But Mr. Tapper persisted. “The White House has no opinion about whether or not the Senate should pass a budget? The president’s going to introduce one. The Fed chairman says not having one is bad for growth. But the White House has no opinion?”

Mr. Carney resisted a direct answer to Mr. Tapper’s question, except to say the president “looks forward to the Senate acting on the policy initiatives contained within his budget,” knowing full well the Senate plans no action on his tax and spending proposals.

Mr. Carney won’t say it, but the White House knows Senate Democrats, especially those in tough re-election races in November, don’t want to vote on this turkey.

Take, for example, Sen. Claire McCaskill, Missouri Democrat, who distanced herself from Mr. Obama’s budget Monday, saying the size of his massive budget deficits were “unacceptable.”

Notably, the budget reviews from the Washington news media’s liberals have been among the most critical of Mr. Obama’s presidency.

“The White House’s budget for fiscal 2013 begins with a broken promise, adds some phony policy assumptions, throws in a few rosy forecasts and omits all kinds of painful decisions,” writes Dana Milbank, a left-wing commentator for The Washington Post.

Even the liberal New York Times was disappointed with the president’s bulging budget, saying it was more a platform for the president’s re-election campaign.

Story Continues →