- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
- U.N. rights chief: Flight MH17 downing possible war crime
- Attack on park in Gaza war kills 10, mostly children
- Calif. protesters to block Israel-owned ships at Port of Oakland
- Obama to give Africa $38M, but tells young leaders: Stop ‘making excuses’ for economy
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Law, not war, way out of Iran problem
Question of the Day
Peter Vincent Pry (“If Iran already has the bomb, what then?” Commentary, Thursday) makes some excellent points regarding the troubling possibility of Iran already possessing the nuclear capacity to wreak immediate and massive deaths and destruction on our nation.
What Mr. Pry and other Middle East experts overlook is Iran’s potential possession of biological weapons, which could cause equal death and disruption. All that Iran’s genocidal leaders may be waiting for to use them is a legitimate excuse to retaliate against any pre-emptive attack that Israel or the United States might launch. Retaliation would be, in Tehran’s eyes, a legitimate response; it would pin the blame for war on the West.
“Regime change in Iran” appears to be a rational and far less risky response, but “arming the majority who want to overthrow the mullahs” within the context of disarming Iran could backfire by sparking an equally troubling list of unintended consequences.
The majority of the Iranians are proud, wise and moral. They understand the insanity and unacceptable genocidal taunts that some of their highest leaders have voiced. Perhaps the United States would do better using the force of international law to oust Iran’s criminal leaders. Weapons possession isn’t a crime. Starting a war or inciting genocide is.
Iranian calls for the elimination of Israel and the Jewish people is a legitimate crime against humanity. Those who incite genocide are in violation of both the United Nations charter and the 1948 Genocide convention, which Iran ratified on Aug. 14, 1956.
The Iranian people should be given a deadline of Aug. 14 to indict any Iranian official who has incited such horrific goals. If they are unwilling or unable to do so, then the United Nations - with or without Security Council approval - should take a leadership role in removing any Iranian leader responsible for such dangerous rhetoric.
I believe law, not war, is the path out of this increasingly dangerous dilemma.
United Nations Council of Organizations
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
Get Breaking Alerts
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- D.C. police chief orders officers not to arrest legal gun owners carrying weapons in public
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
- Washington Times strikes content and marketing partnership with Redskins
- D.C. seeks stay in order striking down ban on handguns in public