- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
- U.N. warns of Muslim ‘cleansing’ in Central African Republic
- Senate blocks change to military sex assault cases
- Drug mix may have cured child born with HIV, doctors say
- De Blasio’s wife irks former mansion chef with ‘servant’ remark
- Russia’s neighbors shiver amid Putin’s Cold War moves in Ukraine
- New SAT: The essay portion is to become optional
- Military group can’t march to honor the fallen at Boston Marathon due to security changes
- Senate passes bills deleting ‘retarded’ from laws
- China announces biggest military hike in 3 years: We are not ‘boy scouts with spears’
Officials: Long-term commitment for U.S. forces in Afghanistan
Top U.S. intelligence and counterterrorism officials Thursday downplayed talk of an early American pullout from Afghanistan, saying U.S. combat forces will stay there until the end of 2014, and there is a commitment for much longer than that.
CIA Director David H. Petraeus told lawmakers the media had “over-analyzed” comments by Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, who told reporters Wednesday that the U.S. wanted to step back from its leading role in combat and move to training and supporting Afghan forces as soon as next year.
Enroute to a NATO ministerial meeting in Brussels, Mr. Panetta told reporters on his plane that the U.S. would seek, working with allies, to transition international forces to a support role for Afghan troops by the the middle of 2013.
Mr. Panetta stressed that the timetable, agreed to by NATO and U.S. officials, for pulling out all U.S. combat forces by the end of 2014 remains in place.
To meet the 2014 deadline, U.S. forces will progressively hand over operations to their Afghan allies as the pullout date draws nearer, Mr. Petraeus said Thursday.
Many observers believe thousands of U.S. troops might remain after 2014 to continue training Afghan forces and hunting al Qaeda and other terror groups. But officials are tight-lipped.
“We’ve said all along that we expected to be involved with the Afghans on that [counterterrorism] and other issues” after the end of combat operations, Daniel Benjamin, counterterrorism coordinator for the State Department, told The Washington Times.
“It’s a pretty good bet that the cooperation will be along a pretty broad front to ensure that Afghanistan doesn’t become once again a launching pad for terrorist activities against the United States, our allies and lots of other nations,” he said.
Nonetheless, concern remains about whether Afghan forces will be able to sustain the fight against the Taliban without NATO help.
The effectiveness of Afghan security forces after 2014 “will depend on the amount of assistance that is provided, the character of that assistance, if you will,” Mr. Petraeus said.
But Rep. Mike Rogers, chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, criticized the mixed messages from the Obama administration about its commitment to Afghanistan, saying they could lead the Taliban and other Afghans to believe insurgents could outlast the international presence.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
- Back to the Future: HUVr Tech marketing video goes viral with hoverboard release tease
- Aronofsky's 'Noah' banned in Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- Russian lawmaker wants to outlaw U.S. dollar, calls it a Ponzi scheme
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Two liberals say Sarah Palin is right: Obama lacks substance
- MSNBC's Rachel Maddow: Bush to blame for Ukraine
- 1M kids stop school lunch due to Michelle Obamas food standards
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again