- Michelle Obama to Latinos: ‘We cannot afford to wait on Congress’ for immigration
- White House urges GOP to act ‘urgently’ on $3.7 billion request for illegal immigrants
- Politicians, criminals using ‘right-to-be-forgotten’ law EU courts forced upon Google
- Combat fatigue: elite special forces troops are ‘fraying,’ Gen. Joseph Votel warns
- German foreign minister to meet Kerry to discuss spying claims
- Florida police spokesman tells citizens: ‘Get yourself some firearms’
- California church handing out ‘travel cash’ to illegals heading east
- PHILLIPS: Liberal lawyers ensuring illegal aliens are never deported
- Chris Christie leading N.H. GOP presidential field; Mitt Romney lingers large
- NYC creates ID card so 500K illegal immigrants can get services
‘Dirty words’ ban in Arizona schools advances
But changes limit censorship to teachers in classes below the college level
Question of the Day
Arizona's foul-mouthed college professors are off the hook. And secondary school teachers need just to watch their language in class.
The state's teacher-censorship bill underwent an overhaul last week amid fears it was too vague and could be extended to instructors' private lives. The proposal, which prohibits the use of the infamous "seven dirty words" or other language deemed indecent by the Federal Communications Commission's broadcast television policy, no longer affects state colleges or universities.
It also now explicitly states that it applies only to "a classroom setting," not private conversations or Internet postings, as previously written.
The bill cleared the state Senate's Government Reform Committee by a 6-2 vote last week. Its prime sponsor, Republican Sen. Lori Klein, said in an interview Monday that her real focus has always been school-age children, and the legislation now reflects that aim.
"These are the young, impressionable minds," she said. "We want to fill them with the highest ideals, values, education, that we can. By the time they're 18 and in college, they've already formed their views."
The measure has touched off a debate about both the free-speech rights of teachers and the state government's willingness to micromanage policy at the classroom level. Critics contend that limits on instructors' words should come only from district school boards, not the state Legislature. While most First Amendment advocates concede that the bill doesn't violate the Constitution, many worry that it would represent a dramatic power transfer.
"What could be the possible benefit of taking the decision-making control away from a local school district?" Ken Paulson, president of the nonprofit First Amendment Center, said in a statement. "It's not a good practice for state governments to place limits on expression, particularly when there's such a viable local option."
Ms. Klein agreed that, in a perfect world, school boards and principals would voluntarily crack down on cursing teachers. But, she said, that isn't happening.
At a state Senate hearing before last week's vote, Ms. Klein produced a witness who said his child was encouraged by his teacher to shout obscenities as a way to blow off steam.
Other panel members said they, too, had heard of teachers using inappropriate language in front of their students. It was only as a last resort, Ms. Klein said, that she decided to push the bill.
"The adults leading the classroom have to set the highest example," she said. "People are tired of this lack of civility. People are desensitized to how people should comport themselves in public. They may say this is an issue of local control. My point is, well, then control it. Because right now, you're not."
The amended bill also gives teachers a few more chances to clean up their acts, if need be. The original proposal called for firing after the third violation, but the amended version makes termination voluntary until the fifth incident. How those violations are tracked and confirmed is unclear, and some of Ms. Klein's colleagues remain concerned that students could abuse their newfound power.
"Are we taking a kid's word who might have an ax to grind? Who decides that it really happened? All of a sudden, we have a teacher hung out to dry ... because a rogue student or students say, 'Teacher, look what I'm going to do to you today; I'm going to go complain to my principal,' " said state Sen. Sam Smith, a Republican. "We all know that kids hold angst against teachers. ... It's almost like the inmates running the asylum."
Despite those reservations, Mr. Smith voted for the bill, but said a system to filter false claims must be implemented.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Ben Wolfgang covers the White House for The Washington Times.
Before joining the Times in March 2011, Ben spent four years as a political reporter at the Republican-Herald in Pottsville, Pa.
He can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP to sue Obama first over health care employer mandate
- Obama calls Netanyahu, says U.S. willing to negotiate Israel cease-fire
- Obama blasts GOP, ignores immigration crisis in Texas speech
- A series of missteps steers Obama's trip off course
- Obama invokes Reagan while prodding GOP on immigration reform
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
The EPA takes its cue from rogue president on wage-garnishment scheme
- Va. Democrat reportedly seeks nude shots of Kendall Jones
- Armed militia sets up Texas command center to 'fight for national sovereignty'
- Obama seeks brisk passage of border children funding bill
- Bloomberg: Pro-gun towns must lack roads
- PRUDEN: 'Dirty Harry' Reids increasing eccentricity
- LeBron James returning to Cleveland Cavaliers
- Bush fixed bowling lanes that Obama wants to renovate
- BRUCE: The feds plot to steal your paycheck
- Breaking special forces: Obama nominee Gen. Joseph Votel warns that elite troops may be 'fraying'
- IRS employee suspended for pro-Obama activities
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq
World Cup's sexiest WAGs