- Venezuela’s Maduro calls on student ‘price vigilantes’ to hit the streets, report businesses
- Atheists smug as Hindus join Satanists to demand display at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Bow before Valkyrie, NASA’s ‘superhero robot’ entry in DARPA challenge
- 10-year-old Pennsylvania boy suspended for pretend bow-and-arrow shooting
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Budget deal to get quick vote in the House
- Comma on!: Twitter erupts over Obama-Castro ‘marriage’
- Sebelius calls for review of Obamacare rollout woes
- American dream dying, but many see free market as solution: Poll
- Air Force base in South Carolina boots Nativity scene
Cyber Command combines offense, defense in planning
Pentagon’s newest division on front line of cyberspace
The Pentagon's newest unified command is marshaling troops for a future war that some say already is being fought in the global communication and information networks that make up cyberspace.
U.S. Cyber Command is housed within the headquarters of the National Security Agency on the Army's sprawling base at Fort Meade, Md.
The command's headquarters has 800 or so personnel, about equal parts civilian and military, plus a number of contractors.
But it has troops scattered across the globe, members of each of the four armed services. For instance, the Marine Forces Cyber Command - the smallest of the four - also is headquartered at Fort Meade and is about 800 troops strong, said Capt. Kevin Schultz, a Marine spokesman.
Then-Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates ordered the creation of Cyber Command in June 2009 after Pentagon brass had wrestled for several years over who should be in charge of military operations in cyberspace.
Because many of the military's information networks rely on systems that are owned and operated by private corporations, the Pentagon's cybersecurity measures must involve the private sector, to some extent.
The Air Force in 2007 announced plans for a cybercommand with a broad mandate, a move widely interpreted as a Pentagon turf grab. The Air Force dropped its plans after a 2008 leadership shake-up under Mr. Gates led to the departure of the service's top military and civilian leaders.
Mr. Gates' decision the following year to establish a multiforce Cyber Command under the director of the National Security Agency put the head of the nation's super-secret electronic espionage effort in charge of the military's activities in cyberspace.
The command became active in May 2010 and was fully operating by the end of October that year, its head, Army Gen. Keith B. Alexander, told Congress last year.
Despite federal budget constraints, cybersecurity is one of the areas where government spending continued to grow this year, and the military is no exception.
The Pentagon budget request for fiscal 2013 seeks $3.4 billion for cybersecurity-related activities, compared with $3.2 billion this year.
Army Col. Rivers L. Johnson, the command's spokesman, said Cyber Command has received $154 million for the current fiscal year, and the Pentagon's 2013 request would include $182 million for the command.
The rest of the $3.4 billion is to be spent on systemwide security measures by other Pentagon agencies, such as the Defense Information Systems Agency, which provides the military's vast global computer network.
The military's spending on cybersecurity dwarfs the $674 million requested for civilian government cybersecurity through the Department of Homeland Security (DHS).
Some observers think that the military's technical and staff capabilities dwarf those of Homeland Security, which is responsible for defending key U.S. industries from cyberattacks.
"DHS is growing in capability, but it will never be the equal of" the National Security Agency and Cyber Command, said former senior DHS policy official Stewart Baker.
Mr. Baker said a "fear factor" over the role of the military and the NSA and concern about civil liberties led Congress to give Homeland Security the cybersecurity role, but civilian officials could call on the military.
"We are still discussing across the administration how to best defend against a 'Cyber 9/11' that affects our critical infrastructure," Gen. Alexander said last year.
Mr. Baker said he was concerned that the administration was "over-lawyering" the issue. "They are putting the cart before the horse," he said.
Mr. Baker said the military should answer the question: How do we defend our networks? Then lawyers could "approve or tweak a plan that can win a war."
"Answer the strategic questions first, rather than the legal ones," he said.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Donald Lambro
Growth spikes are little more than trend-free anomalies
- Teen thugs in DC run wild -- even while wearing GPS ankle bracelets
- Leon Panetta named as source of 'Zero Dark Thirty' scriptwriters information
- New budget accord saves $23 billion -- after $65 billion spending spree
- Obama takes 'selfie' at Mandela's funeral service
- CARSON: Why did the founders give us the Second Amendment?
- VEGAS RULES: Harry Reid pushed feds to change ruling for casino's big-money foreigners
- Tea partiers turn on Capitol Hill budget deal
- Gov't Motors: Obama fudges math on auto bailout, $10.5 billion loss for taxpayers
- More than a quarter million sign up for Obamacare in November
- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend's shopping jumps to his death
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
An objective, analysis-based perspective of D.C. sports as seen through the eyes of lifelong D.C. sports enthusiast, John Heibel.
All of the world’s problems, solved on your back porch
Human interest stories to feed interest, satisfy curiosity and see outside the box.
Politics, economics, and business from a real world perspective.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow