RICHMOND — The Virginia House on Wednesday approved a watered-down bill requiring women to undergo ultrasound imaging prior to having an abortion, removing a mandate for a more invasive procedure at the request of Gov. Bob McDonnell.
Since most abortions take place early in a pregnancy, the original bill, proposed in the House by Delegate Kathy J. Byron, Campbell Republican, would have required many women to undergo a transvaginal procedure to determine the gestational age of their child.
Delegate David B. Albo, Fairfax Republican, offered a substitute bill at the request of Mr. McDonnell that would give the woman the option of undergoing that procedure if one is deemed necessary. It would still, however, require women to undergo a transabdominal “jelly-on-the-belly” ultrasound.
Ms. Byron defended the substitute as still being anti-abortion.
“Some of the misinformation that has been circulating and the things I have learned over the last couple of weeks leads me to believe that informed consent is even more important,” she said.
Mr. McDonnell, a Republican, had indicated support for the original legislation but on Wednesday issued a lengthy statement that said he maintains his anti-abortion stance and supports the informed-consent statute the bill would amend, but Virginia should not force women to undergo an invasive procedure without their consent.
Democrats blasted the substitute because it still mandates the less-invasive ultrasound. And they said it was rushed through the chamber without proper vetting.
“Where else can an individual, without the consent of the woman, apply petroleum jelly to her abdomen, run an instrument across it and not be charged with trespass, assault, sexual battery or aggravated sexual battery?” asked Delegate Joseph D. Morrissey, Henrico Democrat. “I cannot think of one.”
The issue attracted national attention in the past week, with comedian Jon Stewart lampooning it Tuesday night on Comedy Central’s “The Daily Show.” “Saturday Night Live” poked fun at both the ultrasound bill and a separate “personhood” measure that would define life as beginning at conception.
A handful of Democratic legislators have also appeared on national cable news shows to speak out against the legislation, and activists delivered more than 30,000 petitions opposing the two bills to Mr. McDonnell’s office Wednesday morning. A gathering of about 1,000 people opposing the measures took place on Capitol Square on Monday, with others around the state planned for Thursday.
The proposal placed Mr. McDonnell — a strong social conservative who campaigned and governed with a focus on jobs — in a tricky political position. Signing the original bill could have resulted in a backlash against state and national Republicans, considering the kind of attention it has received.
A recent Christopher Newport University/Richmond Times-Dispatch poll showed that 55 percent of Virginia voters opposed the measure, while 36 percent support it.
The national political image of Mr. McDonnell as a rising GOP star who has been an active surrogate for Mitt Romney’s presidential campaign was also at stake.
“As people began to look at that bill and began to see the implications of that bill, women and men all over the commonwealth and all over the country started to weigh in,” said House Minority Leader David J. Toscano, Albemarle Democrat. “And a governor who has his eye on the vice presidency began to say, ‘Wait a minute here; this is a problem.’ “View Entire Story
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
By Jay Sekulow
The left's outrage over the IRS turns to a plea to 'move on'
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
World's Ugliest Dog Contest
Spelling Bee finale
Marines train Afghan soldiers
Rolling Thunder 2013
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal