DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Lawmakers under pressure from constituents in the months after the Casey Anthony trial have found it’s not easy to toughen penalties for parents who don’t immediately report missing children.
Seventeen states have tried to pass “Caylee’s Law” legislation — named after Ms. Anthony’s 2-year-old daughter, whose 2008 disappearance in Florida was not reported for a month — but many of these efforts have failed or stalled over concerns that proposed changes were too broad, and in some cases, not necessary.
Iowa is the latest state to face difficulty trying to strengthen penalties involving how and when parents report missing children. Lawmakers on Wednesday rejected a bill that would have required parents to know their children were safe in any 24-hour period.
A jury found Ms. Anthony not guilty in July in the death of her daughter, whose body was found in woods near her grandparents’ Orlando home six months after she was reported missing. The trial, which was shown on live television, captivated the country, and her acquittal triggered outrage among hundreds of thousands of people who posted about the case on social media sites.
Lawmakers also heard from constituents who urged them to take action.
“They saw what they thought was an injustice. We need to have some response,” said Iowa state Rep. Julian Garrett, a Republican.
But passing legislation attempting to strengthen missing-children laws has been difficult in many states. Only one, New Jersey, has put a new law on its books, said Rich Williams, a policy associate with the National Conference of State Legislature’s Criminal Justice Program.
The Iowa legislative panel rejected the proposed law Wednesday after some questioned whether it was too vague. Marty Ryan, a lobbyist for the Iowa chapter of the Sacramento, Calif.-based Justice Reform Coalition, speculated that it would require parents to check in daily with children sent to summer camp.
Iowa state Rep. Jeff Kaufmann, who co-sponsored the bill, acknowledged that the measure needed work.
“We clearly are moving too fast on this,” said Mr. Kaufmann, a Republican.
By not approving the bill, the panel made it likely the proposal wouldn’t meet a legislative deadline and would be dropped for this session.
Unlike the Iowa proposal, Mr. Williams said, most of the measures proposed in other statehouses require a parent to know a child is missing, avoiding the scenario of having to check on a child at camp. But he said many states have become stuck on determining the age in which the proposals should apply.
In some cases, lawmakers have questioned whether stronger missing-children laws are necessary.
Nebraska state Sen. Tony Fulton said he was inspired by the Anthony case to introduce the bill that would increase penalties for concealing a death. But at a hearing in January, state Sen. Burke Harr called the proposal a “feel-good law” that would make little difference in most homicide cases, including those involving a parent accused of killing a child.
“If you have enough to prove they dumped the body, you probably have enough to prove that, at a minimum, they’re an accessory after the fact and probably responsible for this crime,” Mr. Harr said.View Entire Story
'Your papers, please' must never be heard in America
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
What does the middle-class conservative think about everything? Find out here.
The “Silver Tsunami” created by aging Baby Boomers is hitting America. Let’s explore how we adjust to it, enjoy it and defy negative expectations about age.
A carefully guided tour through the confusing world of modern bookselling and publishing.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall