- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gleick, not Heartland, committed wrongdoing
Kevin Knobloch, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, exhibits shocking hypocrisy about transparent funding in his recent letter to The Washington Times (“Heartland inconsistent on document theft,” Tuesday).
Mr. Knobloch seeks to exploit global-warming alarmist Peter Gleick’s fraud, theft and dissemination of fake documents by singling out the victim of the crimes, the Heartland Institute, for funding criticisms. Mr. Knobloch claims “the public has a right to know” who gives money to the Heartland Institute, a nonprofit, public-policy organization.
Forgive me for citing some inconvenient truths, but the Union of Concerned Scientists has had no qualms about accepting large amounts of cash from groups, including the National Wildlife Federation, the Environmental Defense Fund and the Tides Foundation, each of which refuses to disclose its donors. I am still waiting for Mr. Knobloch to return the money or write letters to the editor singling out these groups for not disclosing their donors.
Also, the Heartland Institute used to disclose all of its donors and encourage other public-policy organizations to do the same. However, the very same groups that refused to be as transparent as the Heartland Institute engaged in harassment campaigns against Heartland donors while hiding behind their own funding anonymity. Eventually, the Heartland Institute tired of this one-way transparency, while the Union of Concerned Scientists responded by cozying up to, forming alliances with and accepting large chunks of money from Heartland’s critics.
Finally, it is appalling that the president of the Union of Concerned Scientists would use this occasion to criticize the Heartland Institute for promoting fact-based, unbiased global-warming science in the schools. How is it that bringing Al Gore’s propaganda into schools is commendable but when the Heartland Institute introduces facts and science to counter propaganda, it “is working to infiltrate” schools? The only wrongdoing here was perpetrated by Union of Concerned Scientists friend Peter Gleick, whether Kevin Knobloch would like us to forget that fact or not.
JAMES M. TAYLOR
Senior fellow, Environment Policy
The Heartland Institute
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
Get Breaking Alerts
- Joe Biden's first Instagram pic mocked as shill for sunglass ad
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Removal of military gear limits options for U.S., NATO in Ukraine
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- CURL: The state of the Union worse than you thought
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Muhammad wouldn't condone Boston bombing
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High heels: Hazardous to one's health?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Marshall's comments hurt GOP, pro-lifers