Column: Capello gives England excuse to fail again
Their colonial history notwithstanding, the English often like to think of themselves as being good at doing the right thing.
Fabio Capello was either incapable or unwilling to accept that, and so said “ciao!” to his $9 million-a-year job as England coach. In doing so, the Italian demonstrated how little he learned about the English psyche in four years in charge of the Three Lions.
For Capello, the question of whether Terry shouted racial abuse at a black player was a matter for English courts to decide. And, strictly speaking, Capello is right. But there are broader considerations here, too, that Capello seemed to ignore, putting him on a collision course with the FA.
By suggesting that the Terry case isn’t an issue for soccer to take a stand, that the Chelsea defender should remain England’s captain because he is innocent until proven otherwise, Capello fell out of sync with both the FA and all those in England of various colors and political persuasions for whom the FA did the right thing.
It’s often wise to be skeptical of politicians who milk the passions and popularity of sports to score easy points. But Prime Minister David Cameron’s assessment of how Capello misjudged English moods was spot on.
“I don’t think he was right about the John Terry issue,” Cameron said Thursday as the nation digested wall-to-wall headlines about Capello’s sudden resignation. “You can’t be captain with that question mark that needs to be answered.”
Terry stoutly insists that he didn’t racially abuse Anton Ferdinand. If he is cleared at his trial in July, the FA decision to strip him of the captaincy will seem in hindsight to have been unfair, just as Capello suggested.
But the FA has a brand _ England _ and the reputation of English soccer to protect. It and others have worked hard _ and still have work ahead _ to rid the English game of racism. A head-in-the-sand, “not our problem” approach from the FA to the Terry case would have raised questions about English soccer’s dedication to the anti-racism cause.
Capello seemingly didn’t grasp that. His argument that it is not for “sports justice” to judge whether Terry committed a crime missed the point and took an overly narrow view of the issues. The FA wasn’t judging Terry by ending his captaincy now. Instead, it was protecting itself and the image of England should he be found guilty later.
Doing so provoked much debate in England about how significant a captain is for a team. Some argued it is merely a ceremonial role no more important than that of a regimental goat.
Still, Terry, as captain, would have been the first player to lift the Henri Delaunay Cup above his head if England wins the European Championship final on July 1. So, even if ceremonial, the captain is still the face of a nation. It would reflect abysmally on England if a few weeks after Euro 2012 its captain is found to have shouted a racial slur at Ferdinand.
The idea that someone should not be punished “until it becomes official” was important for Capello, by all accounts a very principled man. For FA executives, the need to protect England, Terry and the captaincy by stripping him of that role “until the allegations against him are resolved” was so important that they went over Capello’s head and acted without consulting their manager. Both points of view have merit but proved incompatible.
In abandoning ship four months before Euro 2012, the Italian bequeathed to his now ex-players the parting gift of a handy excuse.
If _ or should that be when? _ England labors in Group D against France and Sweden and makes Ukraine look like a decent side, expect Capello’s ghost to re-enter stage left.