- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
MURDOCK: Holder takes on ‘racist’ photo-ID cards
Prejudice is widespread - even Obama backed them
A bunch of racists in South Carolina are trying to hold down blacks by forcing them, and everybody else, to show photo identification before they can vote. Astonishing.
Luckily, Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr. is on it. As he declared in Columbia, S.C., on Martin Luther King Jr. Day, the Palmetto State “failed to meet its burden of proving that the voting change would not have a racially discriminatory effect.” Mr. Holder’s deputy, Assistant Attorney General Thomas E. Perez blocked this provision on Dec. 23, citing “the racial gap that presently exists among photo-identification holders in the state.” Specifically, “8.4 percent of white registered voters lacked any form of DMV-issued ID, as compared to 10.0 percent of nonwhite registered voters.” This 1.6 percent gap can mean only one thing: Racism.
As a black man, I say, “Power to Holder!” I just hope this brave public servant can find the time to fight all the racists who are imposing on blacks and everyone else the extreme indignity of showing ID cards. This undue burden parallels the “colored” water fountains and lunch counters that vanished 48 years ago. As Democratic National Committee Chairman Debbie Wasserman Schultz explained: photo-ID advocates “want to literally drag us all the way back to Jim Crow laws and literally - and very transparently - block access to the polls to voters who are more likely to vote Democratic … .”
Mr. Holder should start by cleaning house in his own building.
A bunch of racists at the Justice Department expect blacks, and everybody, else to show picture ID. Justice’s website repeatedly states, “Photo ID is required to clear security at all locations.” As Jeff Aronson observed in the New York Post, “Before a citizen can enter the U.S. Department of Justice’s office to complain about the need to produce a photo ID before voting, that citizen will need to produce a photo ID to gain entry.”
Mr. Holder can curb ethnic bias at once by scrapping his department’s photo-ID rule.
Next, Mr. Holder should visit Washington’s Union Station. A bunch of racists decided that “Amtrak customers 18 years of age and older must produce valid photo identification when … onboard trains, in response to a request by an Amtrak employee,” and under other particular circumstances. Amtrak’s website lists this regulation, which is targeted at blacks - and everyone else.
If Mr. Holder tours any American airport, he can watch a bunch of racists in the Transportation Security Administration demand that blacks, and everyone else, show photo ID before boarding passenger jets. The TSA could not care less about centuries of anti-black oppression. Instead, their agents just sit there, waiting for passengers to reveal their picture ID cards.
Meanwhile, a bunch of racists determined that blacks, and everyone else, must display photo IDs before buying certain over-the-counter cold remedies that contain ephedrine and other precursors of an illegal drug. According to the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act of 2005, consumers must present “an identification card that provides a photograph and is issued by a state or the federal government.” If Mr. Holder entered any Walgreens, he could witness this injustice.
Fortunately, we know the names of the racists who approved this law.
After passing the House on Dec. 14, 2005, the Senate adopted this measure on March 2, 2006. The senators who voted to rob the dignity of blacks, and everyone else, included such sitting and departed Democrats as Nevada’s Harry Reid, New York’s Charles Schumer and Hillary Rodham Clinton, Massachusetts’ Edward M. Kennedy, and Illinois’ Dick Durbin and - wait a minute - Sen. Barack Obama. Hey, how did that happen?
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Easter symbolizes the freedom to choose eternal life
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CARSON: Recovering Tocqueville's vision of American exceptionalism
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- UNICEF launches 'Mr. Poo' mascot in India to curb public defecation
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Muhammad wouldn't condone Boston bombing
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: High heels: Hazardous to one's health?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Marshall's comments hurt GOP, pro-lifers