- Dr. Ezekiel Emanuel: If you want to pay more for your doctor, you can
- Sen. Rand Paul: ‘I am seriously thinking about’ running for president in 2016
- Sleet, ice, deepfreeze hit large swath of U.S.
- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
IG: D.C. Lottery partner misrepresented experience
The local half of a joint venture that runs the D.C. Lottery misrepresented its business activities during its bid for a stake in the $38 million contract, according to a report by the D.C. inspector general.
The findings mirror conclusions in a report by The Washington Times that showed Veterans Services Corp. boasted on its website of general contracting experience from federal jobs it did not perform for government clients who had never heard of the company.
“OIG investigators reviewed The Washington Times articles alleging that VSC had misrepresented its previous work experience on its website,” the report by Inspector General Charles J. Willoughby says in reference to the contracting jobs. “The [chief operations officer] acknowledged that VSC, which did not exist during the time periods of these construction projects, did not work on them.”
The report says it was unclear whether the claims were made while Chief Financial Officer Natwar M. Gandhi evaluated the company and were, therefore, immaterial to the city’s decisions.
The inspector general’s report largely clears D.C. officials of any illicit activity in awarding the lottery contract in December 2009, although a lawsuit by a former procurement officer says undue influence by certain council members led the city to scuttle an earlier contract award for political reasons.
While the inspector general was not too critical of city leaders, his report may shake up controversial plans for online gambling, or iGaming, in the District because it sheds new light on how the first-in-the-nation program became law.
The report says Mr. Gandhi inserted options in the contract between its approval in December 2009 and its execution in March 2010 that provided for online gambling, “which materially changed the contract requirements.”
The contract was executed “without adhering to procurement regulations and, as a result, may not have received the best price for the District,” the report says.
Mr. Gandhi “strongly disagrees” with the findings, noting “a form of ‘gaming over the Internet’ was presented by each vendor” who responded to the city’s request for proposals, spokeswoman Natalie Wilson said.
“The IG incorrectly asserts that the [Office of the Chief Financial Officer] improperly added the online gambling provision after the bidding had closed,” she said. “The OCFO’s procurement process was completely transparent and adhered to all District procurement laws and regulations.”
Council member Michael A. Brown, at-large independent, inserted the iGaming provision in a supplemental budget bill in December 2010, allowing it to become law.
The inspector general said Mr. Brown should have alerted the council that he worked for a law firm with a gambling-industry interest, but it did not find that Mr. Brown benefited from the connection or did anything wrong.
Council member Jack Evans, Ward 2 Democrat, has called on Mr. Willoughby to testify on his finding Thursday before the Committee on Finance and Revenue.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Obama admin.: One in 10 Obamacare forms might have errors
- Obama administration knew of key Obamacare delay in August, emails say
- House Speaker John Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
- Young millennials shun Obamacare, creating risky imbalance
- Almost 1.5 million deemed eligible for Medicaid in October alone: Obama administration
Latest Blog Entries
- Calif.: Give 'gift of health' by pledging cash for the uninsured
- Tensions hit boiling point over Obamacare enrollment figures, error rates
- Young, uninsured adults vital to Obamacare are not keen on enrolling: New Harvard poll
- Paul Bunyan and Babe the Blue Ox will promote Obamacare at Mall of America
- HealthCare.gov employs a new look once again
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality
- Craigslist killers: Police say newlyweds stabbed man for thrills
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- Dick Cheney: Family feud over gay marriage has been 'dealt with'
- Rush Limbaugh: Obama trying to make Mandela death about himself
- Sen. Rand Paul: Long-term unemployment benefits are disservice to workers
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
White House pets gone wild!