- ‘I Am Alive’ app gains popularity in terror-ravaged Lebanon
- Gun giveaways gain popularity among Republican candidates
- S.C. hospital worker slapped with $525 federal fine for refilling $0.89 soda
- Teen from ‘Jihad Jane’ plot becomes youngest ever to serve time on U.S. terror charges
- Iranian woman forgives son’s killer at the gallows
- Nebraska principal sorry for ‘don’t tattle’ flier
- Illinois readies to spend $100M for Obama museum in Chicago
- John Edwards back in court — this time as a lawyer for Va. boy’s malpractice case
- Covered California reports more than 200K in overtime Obamacare sign-ups
- Thanks, Chuck: Hagel says U.S. sending Ukraine sleeping mats, helmets
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: U.S. should back up verbal support of Taiwan
Recently there has been an unprecedented volume of talk, some of it serious, about the possibility that the United States could be backing away from its arms sales to Taiwan ("Taiwanese president's re-election may sour U.S. arms sales," Web, Jan. 17). This is a serious matter, with academics and officials alike having expressed their views on the implications of the outcome of Taiwan's recent presidential election.
Considering the issue from a variety of perspectives, President Ma Ying-jeou will face many major challenges in his second term. He needs a strategy to ensure that Taiwan remains competitive in cross-strait dynamic balancing. Taiwan needs to improve its defensive strategy and capability because it cannot be absolutely certain that Beijing will never use its increasingly robust military power for some degree of coercion.
Walking away from Taiwan could only sap the United States' negotiating power throughout the region. Moreover, it could send friends in the area, such as Japan and South Korea, into China's arms.
Although Washington was pleased with the peaceful and orderly conduct of the presidential election, what lies ahead for U.S. relations with Taipei is less clear. Talks on closer trade relations and additional weapons sales are stalled. Yet in a major review of U.S. foreign policy, the Obama administration has announced a pivot toward Southeast Asia, opening opportunities for new initiatives with a friendly and democratic Taiwan.
If Washington is as pleased with the Ma government as it claims to be, then more robust initiatives are justified, including sales of advanced F-16 fighter jets, the granting of Taiwan visa-waiver status, Cabinet-level visits, and the inclusion of Taiwan in trade agreements that promote free markets across the Pacific.
Some may ask why the U.S. ought to care about Taiwan. Taiwan is at the core of future political and security relations with China. Increased U.S. support of Taiwan would enable the small democratic island to maintain a sufficient means of self-defense capability. The U.S. should reaffirm its Taiwan Relations Act (TRA) commitment now.
Taiwan Benevolent Association of America
Potomac Falls, Va.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Team Obama's bizarre behavior helps Gitmo terrorists foil justice
Get Breaking Alerts
- BOLTON: A 'three-state solution' for Middle East peace
- With pot and e-cigarettes, Big Tobacco is just waiting to inhale emerging markets
- Jews being told to register in Ukraine: John Kerry
- Atheists rush to stage Easter display: 'Jesus Christ is a myth'
- Cliven Bundy's Nevada ranch wrecked by retreating feds
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- KEENE: Familiar refrains from Britain's 'Tea Party'
- Skeptics on all sides take aim of John Kerry's tentative deal on Ukraine
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Probe Boston teen's medical, custody case
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support a modern-day Tiananmen protest
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: An honorable president would resign
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Bundy support demonstrates voters' distrust
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare disasters were avoidable