- Man arrested in car bomb plot at Kansas airport
- Prison inmates take up ‘Knockout’ game, target female officers
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- John Kerry: Israel-Palestinian peace deal paved for April
- India diplomat who touts women’s rights busted for $3 wage to nanny
- MSNBC host Ed Schultz paid $252K by unions in 2012-2013
- Korean War memorial ordered to take down Christian cross
- Billy Graham near death, ‘close to going home to be with the Lord’
- SeaTac, Wash.: City’s new $15 minimum wage heads to court
- Obama mulls support for Islamists in Syria, with conditions
Loudoun vote key to Metro expansion
Supervisors will vote Tuesday
A $6 billion public-works project 40 years in the making with economic development implications for two states and the District is now in the hands of nine local legislators - only two of whom have been on the job for more than seven months.
Some members of the all-Republican board have been critical of the project’s costs and skeptical of its benefits.
The county’s share of the project is expected to be $270 million, with $10 million in annual operating costs.
The vote comes after seven new Republican members replaced a previously Democratic majority on the board in last year’s elections.
Should Loudoun opt out, the rail would terminate at the airport, planned Metrorail stations at Route 606 and Route 772 in Loudoun would not be built, and the Route 28 station in Fairfax County likely would have to accommodate an overflow of commuter parking. The county also would be sacrificing millions in economic development, proponents say.
“If they stay in, they got a project that’ll do them a lot of good,” said J. Kenneth Klinge, former chairman of the Dulles Corridor Steering Committee. “It can’t just be roads, or rail, or any one thing - it has to be an amalgamation of things. They have to work with each other.”
The other funding partners for Phase 2 include the Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority, the state of Virginia and Fairfax County.
One possible way for Loudoun to fund the project would be to draw a special tax district for commercial properties around the two Metrorail stations to be built in Ashburn. Fairfax County has two such districts - one for each phase of the project - that levy taxes on commercial and industrial properties within their boundaries.
But the influential conservative group Americans for Prosperity, which advocates for lower taxes, launched a robocall campaign asking residents to urge county officials to vote against the rail project.
“Loudoun cannot afford this bailout to rail-station developers,” reads the script. “If the Loudoun County board opts out, the rail will still be built to Dulles Airport, and commuters will still be within five miles of Metro.”
Members of the Loudoun board also had expressed concern about the airports authority’s board vote to favor contractors bidding on Phase 2 who employ union-friendly labor agreements. In response to pressure - much of it from the administration of Gov. Bob McDonnell, a Republican - the airports authority board nixed that provision June 6. Still, at a June 18 work session, Geary M. Higgins of Catoctin, Vice Chairman Janet S. Clarke of Blue Ridge and Kenneth D. Reid of Leesburg presented a signed 21-item list of “opt-in” considerations, including installing a permanent airports authority inspector general, and extending the deadline for a decision to December.
But Jack Potter, the authority’s president and CEO, said the July 4 deadline for Loudoun officials to decide on whether to remain a partner in the project would stand after already being pushed back 30 days.
Chairman Scott K. York has been a consistent advocate for Loudoun’s participation in the project. Others who have voiced support - or at least have expressed publicly that they were leaning toward voting for it - include Matthew F. Letourneau of Dulles, Ralph M. Buona of Ashburn and Shawn M. Williams of Broad Run.
Eugene A. Delgaudio of Sterling is a certain “no” vote, leaving three or four members still in flux.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP Rep. Tim Murphy rolls out mental health legislation
- George W. Bush to embattled Alabama kicker: You will be stronger
- Black supremacist no longer employed at DHS: report
- Senate pulls all-nighter as GOP protests rules change
- Despite questions, Senate panel backs top Homeland nominee
Latest Blog Entries
By Mangosuthu Buthelezi
Memories of a long brotherhood tempered in common struggle
- U.S. Army hails success with drone-shooting laser
- U.S. Navy-China showdown: Chinese try to halt U.S. cruiser in international waters
- Suspected Colo. school gunman kills self amid standoff
- Billy Graham near death, close to going home to be with the Lord
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Obama birther theories float as Hawaii health director killed in crash
- Obama and family holiday in Hawaii again
- PRUDEN: The last living witnesses; they wore the yellow star and remember the Nazi terror
- Obama's Afghanistan experts stumped on U.S. death toll, war costs during hearing
- James Bond: The spy who is really an alcoholic
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Musings of a bilingual, agnostic, combat veteran and jewelry maker.
Topics will include politics, religion, race, culture, and anything else that needs to be discussed...
Our Choice: Individual responsibility and self-government or the abandonment of the American Revolution
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow