- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Battle lines drawn as House weighs farm bill
Question of the Day
A group of House Democrats said Tuesday they would rather defeat the entire farm bill than agree to food-stamp cuts that Republicans are proposing in the legislation, which is expected to see its first committee action Wednesday.
“Overall, this is about whether or not we will have a farm bill,” Rep. Rosa L. DeLauro, Connecticut Democrat, who worked on the last farm bill in 2008, told The Washington Times after a protest Tuesday morning just outside the Capitol. “I fought hard for food stamps and for the changes that we made. I’m not about to see it go backward.”
The farm bill, which must be renewed every five years, funds the government’s agricultural and crop-support programs, and also funds food stamps, whose use has grown dramatically in recent years. Given that growth, GOP lawmakers are eyeing food stamps as a program that could be trimmed amid deep deficits.
The Senate passed a bill last month that would end the direct farm payment system that most sides agree is a failure, and would replace it with a crop insurance program to pay farmers who incur losses.
The House bill also would do away with the direct payment system and replace it with a different crop insurance approach. But it goes much deeper in reducing food-stamp spending, slicing more than $16 billion during the lifetime of the bill.
The Democrats’ opposition to food-stamp cuts signals a tough road for the bill, which amounts to nearly $1 trillion in spending during the next decade.
Congress must submit a bill to President Obama by Sept. 30, or watch all farm bill appropriations revert to 1940 levels — the first version of the bill ever passed. Lawmakers have begun discussing a short-term extension of this deadline to allow more time for negotiations.
Democrats said the proposed cuts in the food-stamp funding, officially known as the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, are a moral issue. They said as many as 3 million people could lose eligibility for food assistance, including roughly 280,000 children who receive school meals.
But Minnesota Rep. Collin C. Peterson, the ranking Democrat on the House Agriculture Committee, said last week the draft bill is a step in the right direction. The bill proposes $35 billion in total cuts over 10 years, compared with about $23 billion in the Senate version.
Mr. Peterson said over the weekend that he expects the cuts in food stamps to be reduced in negotiations before a final compromise bill emerges.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Scott Pinsker
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll - Washington Times#.U9ZSgi7-CXU.twi
- Ohio sheriff sends bill to Mexico for cost of jailing illegals
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq