Congressional Republicans challenged Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta on Tuesday to explain why the Defense Department allowed active-duty troops to wear their uniforms while marching in San Diego’s gay pride parade last weekend.
In a letter to Mr. Panetta, Sen. James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma said department rules bar service members from participating in political activities while in uniform and pressed Mr. Panetta on why a waiver was granted, who requested it and why it was considered over others.
“If the Navy can punish a chaplain for participating in a pro-life event or a Marine participating in a political rally, it stands to reason that the Defense Department should maintain the same standard and preclude service members in uniform from marching in a gay pride parade,” Mr. Inhofe wrote.
In a statement accompanying the letter, Mr. Inhofe said he was concerned that the Obama administration “continues to force its liberal social agenda on the military by promoting the homosexual agenda, mandating the use of high-cost green energy initiatives, pursuing abortion rights and suppressing the free exercise of religious liberties.”
On Saturday, dozens of soldiers, sailors and Marines in uniform marched alongside an old Army truck with a “Freedom to Serve” banner and a rainbow flag. Dozens of military personnel in civilian clothes joined them.
The Pentagon had advised all its branches that it was making an exception for the San Diego parade even though its policy prohibits service members from marching in uniform in political parades. The department said it made the exception because organizers had encouraged military personnel to march in their uniform and the event was getting national attention.
The waiver only applied to this year’s parade in San Diego.
Democrats’ call for gun control rebuffed
A handful of Democrats are calling for a ban on high-capacity ammunition clips after the movie-theater shooting rampage in Colorado, but House and Senate leaders of both parties have no plans to touch the issue this election year.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, along with House Speaker John A. Boehner, told reporters Tuesday that there should be no push for tighter gun control. They say the shooting should not be politicized and that there’s little time left in the polarized Congress to tackle the issue. Still, four Democrats — Sens. Robert Menendez and Frank R. Lautenberg of New Jersey, and Reps. Diana DeGette of Colorado and Rep. Carolyn McCarthy of New York say the shooting is only the latest evidence that the clips should be banned.
Standoff could increase families’ taxes by $1,600
The White House says a standoff with Congress that results in the January expiration of wide-ranging tax cuts would mean 114 million families would see average tax increases of $1,600 next year.View Entire Story
By John Solomon
How the government's punishing of the exposure of official wrongdoing can linger for years
Independent voices from the TWT Communities
A collection of communities writers columns on Benghazi
We welcome you to the intimate and personal thoughts on the news and events we, as editors, watch, read, and discuss with our writers every day.
Consummate traveler Todd DeFeo explores the unique stories that make destinations worth going to.
Looking at pop culture, politics and social issues.
Benghazi: The anatomy of a scandal
Vietnam Memorial adds four names
Cinco de Mayo on the Mall
NRA kicks off annual convention
California wildfires wreak havoc