- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Government OKs Arab-owned company to operate U.S. cargo port
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell’s wife had ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House unveils bill to speed deportations of illegal immigrant children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
- Hillary: ‘Dead broke’ comment was ‘inartful,’ but insists it was ‘accurate’
- Fla. mom arrested for allowing 7-year-old son to walk to park alone
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ethanol’s impact on food prices is minimal
Question of the Day
The editorial, “Biofuel mandates worsen drought’s effect” (Comment & Analysis, Tuesday) makes some dubious assumptions and comes to inaccurate conclusions regarding ethanol production and the food supply. While there is no denying the drought has had a substantial impact on this year’s corn crop, U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Thomas J. Vilsack has gone on the record to say that year’s yield, while down from record predictions, will still meet our food needs, and that obligated parties have the ability to meet the volume requirements of the Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS).
What ethanol critics need in this case is a strong dose of reality. Of the total U.S. crop planted, less than 1 percent is sweet corn. However, more than 99 percent is No. 2 yellow corn, or field corn, the primary use of which is livestock and poultry feed. Just 1.5 percent of that yield is used in actual food production — a minuscule fraction of our yearly corn crop.
The simple reality is the RFS was designed with situations such as this in mind, allowing for flexibility. Already the market has responded — ethanol production has slowed, and we currently have a surplus of nearly 1 billion gallons. Additionally, there are more than 3 billion Renewable Identification Numbers available to ensure obligated parties can meet the volume requirements.
To suggest any meaningful impact on food prices from ethanol production is just hysteria during a time of economic turmoil. Earlier this month, General Mills Chief Executive Ken Powell estimated that food prices would increase by 2 percent to 3 percent, compared to an increase of more than 10 percent last year, noting “consumers should see generally stable prices.”
I find it curious that this editorial said ethanol producers and farmers are engaged in market manipulation when they are simply participating in the free market now, after years of government subsidies keeping corn prices low. We have never, ever run out of corn. Have we run out of cheap corn? Yes. But to attack the free market when it works is downright disingenuous.
President and chief operating officer
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Get Breaking Alerts
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- GOP Senate candidate: Obama needs to visit Central America
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- California's Jerry Brown cites God, 'religious call' to embrace illegals
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Kerry's credibility questioned as fighting in Gaza rages
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Appeals court upholds Obamacare tax as constitutional