LETTER TO THE EDITOR: America’s future, Obama vs. Romney

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

It would seem prudent for each of us, regardless of party affiliation, to step back from all the emotion of the 2012 campaign cycle and seriously contemplate what the country would get with the re-election of President Obama and what it would get with the election of Mitt Romney.

Past experience indicates that an Obama win would result in higher taxes for high earners, while Mr. Romney would extend the Bush tax cuts for everybody. There is little doubt that Mr. Obama would continue to apply Keynesian economic philosophy, practicing his belief that more government and more spending will stimulate the economy. Mr. Romney is more likely to implement the ideas of Milton Friedman, who advocated smaller government and greater reliance on monetary policy and the private sector. Friedman concluded that government cannot be trusted to solve problems because it is by its nature corrupt and inept.

On the energy front, we can expect Mr. Obama to continue his search for a green-energy utopia. He will continue to increase regulation of fossil fuels, leading to less drilling for domestic oil and higher fuel costs. Mr. Romney, on the other hand, is likely to consider that we have more than 300 million vehicles that run on gasoline, and that our factories rely on low-cost fossil fuels to stay competitive. He is likely to expand exploration and use of domestic energy while pursuing only green energy alternatives that are cost-effective.

Health care presents another clear distinction. An Obama re-election will put an end to efforts to repeal the Affordable Care Act, while a Romney presidency would start with an effort to repeal this legislation.

We as citizens have an enormous responsibility to choose wisely this November as the path we select will determine the country we leave to our children and grandchildren.

MIKE FERREER

Ponte Vedra Beach, Fla.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts