Continued from page 1

The players say an email from Curley to then-Penn State University President Graham Spanier dated May 5, 1998, was used as evidence by the report to conclude “Paterno was fully and completely informed of the details of the investigation” of allegations against Sandusky.

“But how does Mr. Freeh know for sure?” the players say in the letter. “Freeh’s investigators did not interview Curley, and Penn State President Graham Spanier (who was interviewed), didn’t remember the email at all.”

The players say an email dated May 13, 1998, from Curley to Schultz, titled “Jerry” and asking, “Anything new in this department? Coach is anxious to know where it stands,” is too vague to be used as proof of a cover-up.

The players point out the District Attorney chose not to prosecute Sandusky after a report was filed by police in 1998 about an allegation of sexual abuse.

The players also say an email from Curley to Spanier and Schultz sent in 2001, after McQueary had seen Sandusky assaulting a boy in the showers of Penn State’s football building, “unjustifiably portrays Paterno as omnipotent apparently for the sole purpose of tearing him down,” in the Freeh report.

“We will never hear from Coach Paterno, but those of us who knew him believe he, deserves the benefit of the doubt and like all citizens, is presumed innocent until proven guilty.”