- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
EDITORIAL: Romney’s pilgrimage to Israel
All we are saying is give strength a chance
Question of the Day
Mitt Romney’s trip to Israel was spun by most commentators as an attempt to appeal to American Jewish voters. More importantly, though, it sent a message that under Mr. Romney’s leadership, the United States would no longer be ashamed to seek peace through strength.
President Obama’s theory of Middle East peace is based on the standard leftist critique that U.S. favoritism toward Israel is the major impediment to reaching an agreement. His fawning outreach to Muslim states was intended to level the playing field, to allow America to act — in his view — as an honest broker. That effort has been a stunning failure. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has resisted American proposals he views as contrary to his country’s interests, and Palestinians have sought to find ways to exploit what they sense is American weakness. The general view of America in the Middle East is as bad as it’s ever been.
Mr. Romney doesn’t seek to curry favor but to take a strong stand based on principle and interest. The principles involved are freedom and democracy, both of which are solely represented in the region by Israel. The interest is standing by and defending a nation that is an American friend and strategic partner, particularly in the face of potential nuclear aggression from the Iranian mullahs. It’s fruitless to attempt to portray the United States as neutral in the region’s disputes. Not only has America traditionally taken Israel’s side, it’s right to do so.
Mr. Romney was criticized for referring to Jerusalem as Israel’s capital, but it offered his most telling contrast with his opponent. In 2008, then-candidate Barack Obama told the AIPAC conference, “Let me be clear. Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel, and it must remain undivided.” Yet faced with an abrupt intifada among his Muslim supporters, Mr. Obama quickly bowed to the pressure. By the time he became president, his administration had adopted the Palestinian line of East Jerusalem as a settlement, and Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton demanded that there be no Israeli “natural growth” in the city, which was her term for Jewish babies.
Mr. Romney even touched on an important litmus-test issue: moving the U.S. embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. The Jerusalem Embassy Act set May 31, 1999, as the deadline for moving our embassy, but three presidents have signed waivers pushing the deadline back. President George W. Bush at least noted in his waivers that his administration remained “committed to beginning the process of moving our embassy to Jerusalem,” but Mr. Obama dropped even that lukewarm pledge. Mr. Romney said he would make the move, setting the timetable in cooperation with Israel’s government.
In reaction to Mr. Romney’s embassy statement, Palestinian chief negotiator Saeb Erekat made a veiled threat that 57 Arab and Muslim governments might close down U.S. embassies in their countries in response. So be it. If the United States wants to regain its status as a superpower, it will have to begin acting like one. American weakness hasn’t brought the regional parties any closer to peace. All we are saying is give strength a chance.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: West shouldn't pander to Putin
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: 'Redskins' hardly the only offender
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Radar, torpedos to end Hamas tunnels?
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Gaza 'analysis' poorly veiled bigotry
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- Houston mayor: Sorry that police put man's blind dog on road to die
- HUSAIN: Worlds grand ayatollahs rally behind Sistani