You are currently viewing the printable version of this article, to return to the normal page, please click here.

LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Consequences of women in combat

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

Rowan Scarborough makes several compelling points in "Army may train women for rigor of front lines" (Web, Monday). If a woman can meet the battle-tested standards of the infantry, then I believe she should have the same opportunity as men. However, all Americans should then be mandated to register for the draft.

Rep. Loretta Sanchez, California Democrat, and Sen. Kirsten E. Gillibrand, New York Democrat, recently introduced legislation to encourage the "repeal of the Ground Combat Exclusion policy" for women. But they failed to mention changing the Selective Service law. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the male-only draft in Rostker v. Goldberg (1981). The reasoning is that because women are excluded from direct combat, their service would not be needed for the draft. This logic disintegrates if women are to fight in the infantry; therefore, the law must be amended.

Also, the military fitness standard for women is drastically lower than for men, as Mr. Scarborough's piece mentions. If women are allowed in direct-combat units, then to ensure equality and safety, the military should apply one standard, irrespective of sex. However, we should recognize that a single fitness standard naturally will lead to women ranking lower than their male counterparts and thus be less competitive for promotion, which is the opposite of this initiative's intent.

DAVID DIXON

Quantico, Va.

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts