- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Roberts refused to legislate from the bench
Question of the Day
On Independence Day, I watched the musical “1776,” and one scene reminded me of the position of Supreme Court Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. when he rendered his decision last week on the constitutionality of Obamacare.
In the movie, John Hancock, as president of the Continental Congress, had to cast a tie-breaking vote on independence. This required a unanimous vote in the body. Hancock voted for the resolution, prompting John Adams to respond, “You sank us.” Justice Roberts‘ decision has angered many conservatives, but I believe he attempted to get at least one of the liberal justices to agree that the law was unconstitutional. I think once he realized that would not happen - and that his vote alone would overturn a law that was not only passed by a majority of Congress, but signed into law by the president - he saw he could not do it. To have done so would have constituted legislating from the bench, which is what conservatives have long fought.
Anyone who read Justice Robert’s judicial opinion as I have would understand his position was that the voters have the responsibility to replace those members of Congress who voted for the law with new ones who will vote to repeal it.
JOHN B. BLOOM
Newport News, Va.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
Get Breaking Alerts
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- House GOP resurrects border bill, predicts successful Friday vote
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Pentagon wants extra $19M to equip, train Ukrainian troops