Talks stall on reopening Pakistan supply routes to Afghanistan

Question of the Day

Should Congress make English the official language of the U.S.?

View results

WASHINGTON (AP) — The U.S. team that tried for more than a month to negotiate a reopening of blocked Pakistani supply routes into Afghanistan is coming home without an agreement, Pentagon press secretary George Little said Monday.

The U.S. recalled the team after the top Pakistani general refused to meet with a top Defense Department official, Mr. Little said.

“We remain ready to conclude this agreement as soon as Pakistan is ready,” said U.S. Embassy spokesman Robert Raines in Islamabad. Officials in Washington and Islamabad would not detail what led to the break in the talks.

Pakistan closed the key supply routes in November in retaliation for a U.S. air assault that killed 24 Pakistani soldiers. The routes through Pakistan were an important means of getting U.S. war materiel into Afghanistan. Since then, NATO and the U.S. have been using a circuitous northern route to bring supplies into troops fighting there.

Part of the U.S. team left Islamabad over the weekend, Mr. Little said. Mr. Raines said the remainder left Monday.

Mr. Little said they were prepared to return on short notice if circumstances change.

A senior Defense Department official, Peter Lavoy, talked to senior Pakistani officials over the weekend but was not allowed to meet with Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, chief of the Pakistani army.

The Pakistani Foreign Ministry declined to comment.

Meanwhile, the No. 2 commander in Afghanistan, U.S. Army Lt. Gen. Curtis Scaparrotti, acknowledged the troubled Washington-Islamabad relationship but said the closed border has not affected his operations.

Gen. Scaparrotti said commanders are “working very hard” to improve the military-to-military relationship between the two countries and get it back to where it was before the November killings.

“We’re a fair ways from that right now,” he said.

But Gen. Scaparrotti said the U.S. has built alternative supply routes and has been able to get what it needs for the war despite the border closing. NATO last week finalized those agreements to move supplies through other countries.

“It’s not really affected us,” he told Pentagon reporters via a videoconference from Afghanistan.

The U.S. team negotiating with the Pakistanis was there for about six weeks, Mr. Little said, but he declined to say what progress it made in that time.

“A decision was reached that it was time to bring the team home for a short period of time,” he said. “Again, we’re ready to send them back at any moment.”

There have been a number of sticking points in the talks to reopen the border. Pakistan has demanded an apology for the November deaths, while Washington will go only so far as to express regret for the deaths. There have also been tough negotiations over the fee that Pakistan would charge for each truck to cross its territory. Before the November attack, the cost had been $250 per truck. As of late May, Pakistan was demanding $5,000 per truck, and the U.S. countered with $500. It’s unclear where that issue stood as of Monday.

Last week, Pakistani-U.S. relations hit a new low. Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta visited India, Pakistan’s archrival, and Afghanistan and in each locale openly expressed frustration with the Pakistani government’s willingness to help the U.S. in the war on terror, and acknowledged aloud that “the whole idea” was to leave Pakistan in the dark about the secret raid that killed Osama bin Laden in an Army garrison town in Pakistan last year.

Associated Press writer Pauline Jelinek in Washington and Chris Brummitt in Islamabad contributed to this report.

Copyright 2014 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks