- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
DALY: Harper, Trout — Think Mays, Mantle
Question of the Day
What’s happening in baseball feels almost like a celestial event. Like two comets crisscrossing. Like a day-night doubleheader of eclipses. On one coast you have Bryce Harper, 19 years young, almost instantly becoming the top bat for the first-place Washington Nationals. And on the Pacific side of things, you have Mike Trout, all of 20, out-OPS-ing Albert Pujols, his Hall of Fame-bound Los Angeles Angels teammate, by nearly 200 points.
It’s enough to make you reach for a pair of dark sunglasses, lest you singe your retinas. Talent of this magnitude, at such a precocious age, doesn’t come along often … in any sport. But it’s lovely when it does, especially since everybody these days seems to be toting a camera phone — and recording every moment for posterity.
Here’s Bryce blasting one off the BlackBerry sign in Toronto.
Here’s Mike going 4 for 4 against Seattle.
Here’s Bryce stealing home after Philadelphia’s Cole Hamels plunked him.
Here’s Mike swiping his league-leading 16th base Wednesday night at Dodger Stadium.
And they’re just getting underway.
It’s early, sure, but you get the sense these two outfielders are going to be playing Highlight Tag for the next decade or so. They’re the sports equivalent of Irish twins — Trout breaking in with the Angels midway through last season, Harper being called up by the Nats 20 games into this one. Indeed, they remind you a little of Mickey Mantle and Willie Mays, center fielders supreme, debuting in 1951 at 19 (Mantle) and 20 (Mays).
Mickey, of course, went on to wallop 536 homers, and Willie reached an even loftier total: 660. Better still, they shared the same city in the early part of their careers (in the years, that is, before the Giants moved to San Francisco). Harper and Trout won’t enjoy quite the same proximity, their home bases being 2,500 miles apart, but the world is a much smaller place than it was half a century ago. Besides, as he showed at Rogers Centre this week, Bryce might be able to hit the ball 2,500 miles.
At last glance, Harper had a .303/.384/.548 line (OPS+: 150), and Trout — 14 months older, for those of you scoring at home — was at .341/.401/.541 (OPS+: 163). Nice starting points, especially if you want to make some history. After all, Alex Rodriguez reached The Show at 18, Ken Griffey Jr. at 19 and Frank Robinson and Eddie Mathews, to name two more legends, at 20. All topped 500 homers, and all are either in Cooperstown or headed in that direction.
In other words, for all the hand-wringing about “rushing” phenoms such as these, many of the greats made it to the majors — and did damage there — before they reached drinking age. It’s one of the reasons they were so great.
As much as Harper and Trout might mean to their franchises, though, they might mean even more to baseball. Since the advent of drug testing, you may have noticed, the pendulum has swung from the hitters to the pitchers. San Francisco’s Matt Cain threw the second perfect game of the season Wednesday night — the Chicago White Sox’s illustrious Philip Humber tossed the first — and, according to Elias’ number crunchers, this is the first time since 1917 there have been five no-nos by mid-June.
(Heck, a New York Met even fired a no-hitter. The franchise had been waiting only 51 years for that.)
The Pittsburgh Pirates, meanwhile, have an OPS of .640. This wouldn’t be good even by the Dead Ball standards of 1917. In fact, six big-league clubs had a higher OPS that season than the Pirates currently do. Oh, and did I mention that the Nats’ 2.94 earned-run average, if it holds up, would be the lowest since the 1988 Mets (managed by a fellow named Davey Johnson)?
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Dan Daly has been writing about sports for the Washington Times since 1982. He has won numerous national and local awards, appears regularly in NFL Films’ historical features and is the co-author of “The Pro Football Chronicle,” a decade-by-decade history of the game. Follow Dan on Twitter at @dandalyonsports –- or e-mail him at email@example.com.
- DALY: Rookies RG3, Alfred Morris hold their own against two Browns greats
- DALY: Players soon may equate Redskins with winning
- DALY: Just the tip of the iceberg for these Redskins
- DALY: Quarterbacks waste no time making impact
- DALY: Striking a balance integral to Redskins’ success
Latest Blog Entries
By David Keene
Allowing states to innovate could reduce dependency on bureaucracy
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- White House says Russia 'losing' war in Ukraine
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- DeSean Jackson working on offensive cohesiveness with Redskins teammates
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq