- Unbeliebable: White House turns Bieber petition response into immigration screed
- Obama signs law denying Iran ambassador’s visa, but says law is ‘advisory’
- Mich. judge to laughing convicted killer: ‘I hope you die in prison’
- Man charged in Kansas City-area highway shootings
- Keystone XL pipeline still on hold after State Dept. decision
- Fla. man charged with killing 16-month-old son to play Xbox undisturbed
- Drones from the deep: Pentagon develops ocean-floor attack robots
- Michigan mayor slaps back atheists’ try to erect ‘reason station’ at city hall
- PHILLIPS: Where is the conservative establishment?
- 7.5-magnitude earthquake shakes southern Mexico
Tell treaty advocates to get LOST
The United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) now before the U.S. Senate for deliberation was met in 1982 with disapproval by President Reagan, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and later, Donald H. Rumsfeld, the secretary of defense from 2001 to 2006.
It would create a new, international seabed authority that would nationalize about two-thirds of the Earth’s surface, and could be the largest power grab for redistribution of ocean wealth in history, taking much wealth from America without being accountable to the American people.
LOST is as harmful today as it was 30 years ago because hundreds of billions of dollars could be taken from the United States and redistributed as massive welfare all over the globe. On March 10, 1983, Reagan declared an exclusive ocean economic zone by presidential proclamation, and America is a founding member of the Arctic Council. In 1990, the council set our continental-shelf boundary with Russia in the Arctic. According to former Attorney General Edwin Meese, treaties cannot give any new sovereignty or rights to the United States we do not already have.
The U.S. Navy is perfectly able to protect the freedom of seas and American interests, and there is no reason to trust our security and economy to an international treaty with some U.N. members who wish us harm. According to proponents of LOST, which is supported by President Obama, all living secretaries of state, Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta and some military leaders, the treaty is needed to subordinate America’s sovereignty in order to help settle disputes in the South China Sea and in other places. Toward that end, the Obama administration apparently wants to allow encroachment in our waters by foreign powers, to burden and constrain the U.S. Navy and to subject the United States to international judgments by U.N. bureaucrats.
Reagan rightly believed LOST was a U.N. scheme to raid America’s treasury for billions of dollars and then redistribute that wealth to the rest of the world. The current administration has revived LOST based on its support for redistribution ideology. Pre-planned talking points have been presented in one-sided hearings to generate support for treaty ratification.
In my opinion, Reagan’s decision should stand and LOST should remain relegated to the trash bin of history.
LT. COL. DOMINIK GEORGE NARGELE
U.S. Marine Corp. (retired)
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
Women losing coverage under Obamacare, too
Get Breaking Alerts
- Scalia to students on high taxes: At a certain point, 'perhaps you should revolt'
- Former Ranger breaks silence on Pat Tillman death: I may have killed him
- Special Forces' suicide rates hit record levels casualties of 'hard combat'
- Feds approve powdered alcohol; 'Palcohol' available later this year
- Nancy Pelosi washes immigrants' feet in humble Holy Week act then promotes on Twitter
- Army goes to war with National Guard, seizes Apache attack helicopters
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- Harry Reid blasts Bundy ranch supporters as 'domestic terrorists'
- EDITORIAL: Mark Warner running scared?
- Inside China: Marine's comment on islands draws sharp Chinese response