- Running on empty: EPA slashes biofuel goals because of ethanol shortage
- ‘Gay Jeans’ that fade into rainbow-colored denim created
- Divided court strikes down big porn award
- Jimmy Carter: Don’t hurt Russian people with sanctions
- Oldest ex-MLB player dies in Cuba, 2 days shy of 103rd birthday
- ‘Top Gun’ for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy’s approval
- Bill Clinton to endorse Charlie Rangel for re-election
- Pfc. Bradley Manning is now Pfc. Chelsea Manning: Court says so
- Secret base U.S. special forces used to train Libyans now under terrorist control: report
- 9th suspect in N.C. kidnapping turns self in to FBI
Tell treaty advocates to get LOST
The United Nations Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) now before the U.S. Senate for deliberation was met in 1982 with disapproval by President Reagan, British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher and later, Donald H. Rumsfeld, the secretary of defense from 2001 to 2006.
It would create a new, international seabed authority that would nationalize about two-thirds of the Earth’s surface, and could be the largest power grab for redistribution of ocean wealth in history, taking much wealth from America without being accountable to the American people.
LOST is as harmful today as it was 30 years ago because hundreds of billions of dollars could be taken from the United States and redistributed as massive welfare all over the globe. On March 10, 1983, Reagan declared an exclusive ocean economic zone by presidential proclamation, and America is a founding member of the Arctic Council. In 1990, the council set our continental-shelf boundary with Russia in the Arctic. According to former Attorney General Edwin Meese, treaties cannot give any new sovereignty or rights to the United States we do not already have.
The U.S. Navy is perfectly able to protect the freedom of seas and American interests, and there is no reason to trust our security and economy to an international treaty with some U.N. members who wish us harm. According to proponents of LOST, which is supported by President Obama, all living secretaries of state, Secretary of Defense Leon E. Panetta and some military leaders, the treaty is needed to subordinate America’s sovereignty in order to help settle disputes in the South China Sea and in other places. Toward that end, the Obama administration apparently wants to allow encroachment in our waters by foreign powers, to burden and constrain the U.S. Navy and to subject the United States to international judgments by U.N. bureaucrats.
Reagan rightly believed LOST was a U.N. scheme to raid America’s treasury for billions of dollars and then redistribute that wealth to the rest of the world. The current administration has revived LOST based on its support for redistribution ideology. Pre-planned talking points have been presented in one-sided hearings to generate support for treaty ratification.
In my opinion, Reagan’s decision should stand and LOST should remain relegated to the trash bin of history.
LT. COL. DOMINIK GEORGE NARGELE
U.S. Marine Corp. (retired)
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Obama's veil of secrecy is pierced
Get Breaking Alerts
- 'Top Gun' for drones: Squadrons of carrier-based killers have Navy's approval
- Pentagon plans to replace flight crews with 'full-time' robots
- America is an oligarchy, not a democracy or republic, university study finds
- Obama avoids 'red line' for China, prepared to impose tougher sanctions on Russia
- Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy hailed as patriot, ripped as lawless deadbeat
- Texas is next! AG warns BLM wants 90,000 acres after Bundy ranch standoff
- Russian bombers buzz U.K. airspace; jets scrambled to chase off 'Bears'
- Kansas will nullify local regulation of guns
- ISTOOK: Obama's sleight of hand hides hidden government's work
- CARSON: When government looks more like foe than friend