- Israel hits symbols of Hamas rule; scores killed
- Mississippi abortion law can’t be enforced
- Teacher who survived Sandy Hook has book deal
- Jury awards Jesse Ventura $1.8M in case vs. ‘American Sniper’ author Chris Kyle
- Middle Eastern firm’s deal to manage U.S. cargo port raises security concerns
- Bob McDonnell’s defense: Lonely wife developed ‘crush’ on CEO
- Chinese hackers stole ‘huge quantities’ of sensitive data on Israel’s Iron Dome
- House Republicans unveil bill to speed deportations of border children
- Californians protest middle school for hiring white man to teach cultural studies
- Killer’s sentencing overturned because mother couldn’t find seat in courtroom
HICKS: Michigan’s ‘Monologues’ don’t protect women
Question of the Day
Bear with me here while I make a point.
Vagina, vagina, vagina.
There. I said it.
The “V-word” has been typed repeatedly for effect, and of course, as expected, this gesture means exactly nothing. Because it’s not what you say, but how you say it and for what reason that really counts.
Yet here in Michigan where I live, feminists in our state legislature and their radical supporters would have you believe that simply uttering the word “vagina” in the chamber of our State House of Representatives, as well as the word “vasectomy,” caused two legislators to be subsequently silenced by the House speaker.
It would be hard to conclude otherwise, given the misleading headlines being slapped on stories across the national media: “Michigan Lawmaker Silenced for Saying ‘Vagina,’ ” they read, clearly implying an unwritten subhead, “Midwest bumpkins too uptight to hear anatomically correct term.”
The real reason for such a simplistic and misleading headline is embarrassingly obvious, for where there’s a debate about whether women may use the word “vagina,” can legislation affecting abortion-on-demand be far afield?
Here’s what the ruckus is really all about, and to be clear, it has nothing to do with fussy feminists’ right to say provocative words beginning with the letter “V.”
On June 13, the Michigan House of Representatives passed sweeping omnibus legislation to regulate abortion services in Michigan so that such services would meet the minimum standards required for other kinds of surgical clinics in the state.
The new regulations are meant to address major issues, such as the finding by the State Senate’s Appropriations Subcommittee on Licensing and Regulatory Affairs that while 99 percent of abortions in Michigan in 2010 were performed at abortion clinics, only four of those 32 clinics actually are licensed. Most are rarely or never inspected. Of those that have been inspected, most have been cited for noncompliance regarding surgical equipment sterilization, the failure to maintain a sterile environment and failure to perform sterile preoperation hand-washing.
In other words, women’s health is being jeopardized by unlicensed, uninspected, unsanitary abortion clinics, and the state legislature seeks to improve the medical standards in these facilities.
Also, the legislation seeks to address the issue of coerced or forced abortions. Research shows 64 percent of women report they are forced into having an abortion, and 84 percent feel they aren’t properly informed before an abortion. Informed consent is the standard for all medical care in America (ask any parent who spends a half-hour signing forms just to have a child vaccinated), but when it comes to abortion, feminists seek to protect women’s ignorance so that abortion-on-demand remains an unchallenged “choice.”
Another requirement of the legislation would impose insurance requirements on abortion practitioners, presumably so that women can be confident the doctors they choose are appropriately insured against losses due to negligence or malpractice. Again, this regulation would protect women patients, who presumably now just assume that physicians carry malpractice coverage.
In the face of these horrible impositions on abortion providers (in case you’re a feminist, that was sarcasm), Michigan’s radical feminist legislators — who clearly are more interested in protecting abortion than the women who might choose (or be forced) to have one — boldly spoke out.
Democrat Rep. Lisa Brown, snarkily directing a comment toward House Speaker James “Jase” Bolger, said, “Mr. Speaker, I’m flattered that you’re all so interested in my vagina, but ‘no’ means ‘no.’ “
And after not being recognized to speak, Democrat Rep. Barb Byrum left the microphone, shouting something about extending regulations for vasectomies.
This is what constitutes advocacy for women in the Mitten State? No thanks.
These radicals were rightly disciplined by the House for their actions, not their meaningless words. Adding to the silliness of their outbursts, both women took part in a reading of “The Vagina Monologues” on the steps of the State Capitol on Monday.
These gals will not be silenced, all right. Too bad the same cannot be said for all the women whose aborted lives are so routinely forgotten.
• Marybeth Hicks is the author of “Don’t Let the Kids Drink the Kool-Aid: Confronting the Left’s Assault on Our Families, Faith and Freedom.” Find her on the web at http://marybethhicks.com.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
- Boehner rules out impeachment: 'Scam started by Democrats'
- Obama thanks Muslims for 'building the very fabric of our nation'
- Federal judge grants 90-day stay in D.C. gun case
- Inside the Beltway: Immigration rage festers on all sides
- Obama's brother wears Hamas scarf bearing anti-Israel slogans in photo
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Smugglers, rainstorm combine to poke holes in border fence
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Obama: 'Not a new Cold War,' but new Russia sanctions announced
- Hillary Clinton: I was indeed 'dead broke,' but shouldn't have said so
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world