- Texas man arrested for powder-letter hoax
- Islamic State opens ‘marriage bureau’ for single jihadists
- Drone almost blocks California firefighting planes
- Tornado rips off roofs, downs trees near Boston
- GOP: Environmental rules keeping agents from accessing border
- John Kerry: Millions displaced by religious fighting in 2013
- Federal appeals court rules against Virginia’s gay marriage ban
- White House says Russia ‘losing’ war in Ukraine
- Hamas turns to North Korea for weapons deal, Iran for money
- Syrian casualties surge as jihadis consolidate
Andrew Sarris, a celebrated movie critic, dies at age 83
Question of the Day
NEW YORK — Andrew Sarris, a leading movie critic during a golden age for reviewers who popularized the French reverence for directors and inspired debate about countless films and filmmakers, died Wednesday. He was 83.
Mr. Sarris was best known for his work with the Village Voice, his opinions especially vital during the 1960s and 1970s, when movies became “films” or even “cinema” and critics and fans argued about them the way they once might have clashed over paintings or novels.
No longer was the big screen just entertainment. Thanks to film studies courses and revival houses, movies were analyzed in classrooms and in cafes. Audiences discovered such foreign directors as Federico Fellini and Ingmar Bergman, rediscovered older works by Howard Hawks, John Ford and others from Hollywood, and welcomed new favorites such as Robert Altman and Martin Scorsese.
Mr. Sarris started with the Voice in 1960 and established himself as a major voice in 1962 with the essay “Notes on the Auteur Theory.” Acknowledging the influence of French critics and even previous American writers, Mr. Sarris argued for the primacy of directors and called the “ultimate glory” of movies “the tension between a director’s personality and his material.”
He not only helped write the rules, but filled in the names. He was a pioneer of the annual “Top 10” film lists that remain fixtures in the media. In 1968, he published “The American Cinema: Directors and Directions 1929-1968,” what Mr. Sarris described as “a collection of facts, a reminder of movies to be resurrected, of genres to be redeemed, of directors to be rediscovered.” Among his favorites: Ford, Hawks, Orson Welles and Fritz Lang. Categorized as “Less Than Meets the Eye”: John Huston, David Lean, Elia Kazan and Fred Zinnemann.
The critic himself would be criticized, especially by his enduring rival, Kael, a West Coast-based reviewer who in 1967 was hired by the New Yorker. In the 1963 essay “Circles and Squares,” Kael mocked Mr. Sarris‘ ideas as vague and derivative, trivial and immature. She later wrote off the auteur theory as “an attempt by adult males to justify staying inside the small range of experience of their boyhood and adolescence.”
Although Kael herself went on to celebrate such directors as Altman and Brian De Palma, the two never reconciled, and friends divided into “Sarristes” and “Paulettes.” When Kael died, in 2001, Mr. Sarris acknowledged that they “never much liked each other” and added that he found her passing less upsetting than the demise days earlier of actress Jane Greer.
“They go together like Petruchio and Kate, Zeus and Hera, Bobby Riggs and Billie Jean King,” Kent Jones wrote in Film Comment in 2005 about Mr. Sarris and Kael. “Despite the fact that they shared certain predilections and preferences (for Godard in the Sixties, Altman in the Seventies, and ‘The Earrings of Madame de …’ now and forever), they never stopped battling after 1963.”
Kael aside, Mr. Sarris was greatly admired by his peers and even some directors. “Citizen Sarris,” a collection of essays about the critic published in 2001, included contributions from critics Roger Ebert and David Thomson, and from filmmakers Mr. Scorsese, John Sayles and Budd Boetticher. Mr. Scorsese, with whom Mr. Sarris briefly shared an office at New York University, praised him as “a fundamental teacher” and credited him for helping “see the genius in American movies.”
Mr. Sarris was a heavyset and sad-eyed man, a deeply knowledgeable, elegiac critic with a notable willingness to admit error. He dismissed Billy Wilder in 1968 as being “too cynical to believe even his own cynicism,” then years later (with a nudge from Francois Truffaut) said he was wrong. After initially panning Stanley Kubrick’s “2001: A Space Odyssey,” he gave the 1968 film another try — under different circumstances — in 1970.
“I must report that I recently paid another visit to Stanley Kubrick’s ‘2001’ while under the influence of a smoked substance that I was assured by my contact was somewhat stronger and more authentic than oregano on a King Sano [cigarette] base,” he confided.
“Anyway, I prepared to watch ‘2001’ under what I have always been assured were optimum conditions, and surprisingly [for me] I find myself reversing my original opinion. ‘2001’ is indeed a major work by a major artist.”
Mr. Sarris was born in Brooklyn in 1928, the son of a real estate investor who lost much of his fortune during the Great Depression. (Always broke, but never poor, was how Mr. Sarris remembered his childhood.)
TWT Video Picks
By Scott Pinsker
- D.C. seeks to stay judge's order allowing gun owners to carry in public
- Illegal immigrants demand representation in White House meetings
- Hillary Clinton: Forget Obama, George W. Bush made her 'proud to be an American'
- Babson College, BYU win top spots in Money magazine's college rankings
- Iraqi Christians rally at White House: 'Obama, Obama, where are you?'
- Tennessee Gov. Haslam slams White House for secret dump of illegals in his state
- Romney would win popular vote in rematch against Obama: CNN poll
- White House defends Kerry failure to broker Middle East cease-fire
- D.C. plans to seek stay of order striking down ban on handguns in public
- Islamic State opens 'marriage bureau' for single jihadists
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq