- House Democrats trying to force unemployment insurance vote
- Sen. Claire McCaskill to tackle sex assault at college next
- Judge’s order preserves NSA surveillance records
- Refurbished Pollock masterpiece goes on display
- Iditarod becomes mad dash for Nome
- ‘Burger King baby’ now seeks birth mom on Facebook
- Study: 2 percent of Americans have new hips, knees
- Friend: Pistorius shot gun out car without warning
- States wrestle with developing, restricting drones
- Japan marks 3rd anniversary of tsunami disasters
Universal Music, EMI seek merger OK
Combined share of market, at 40%, would overshadow Sony, Warner
What do pop-music rivals Rihanna and Katy Perry have in common? Well, they could be working for the same team if a merger between their parent companies, Universal Music Group and EMI, gains approval from U.S. and European regulators.
The possibility that the Big Four music firms could soon become the Big Three has consumer advocates worried.
Universal Music Group already controls 30 percent of the market, and the acquisition of EMI could bump it to 40 percent - well ahead of nearest rival Sony, at 30 percent, and Warner at 19 percent, according to industry data from Nielsen SoundScan.
Lawmakers on the Senate's Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights made their voices heard yesterday as they questioned both supporters and opponents of the merger.
Chairman Herb Kohl, Wisconsin Democrat, seemed skeptical, noting the negative effects the proposed merger could have on independent labels and prices for consumers.
The changes have made the industry’s traditional problems with price fixing and market concentration a thing of the past, he said.
Roger Faxon, CEO of EMI, also testified in support of the merger. He told lawmakers that with Apple and Amazon accounting for 90 percent of sales and 80 percent of total digital revenues, record companies are in no position to manipulate the market.
“In this environment, pricing does not sit within the gift of record companies, regardless of size or market position,” he said.
Gigi Sohn, president of Public Knowledge, a Washington-based public interest group, was unconvinced.
She disputed the claims that the music industry titans were victims of a changing market and therefore deserving of a special exemption. The merger, she said, would lead to “less competition, stifled innovation, and high prices.”
Ultimately the Federal Trade Commission will decide if the merger passes antitrust muster, a decision still forthcoming.
The European Commission already has expressed concern that the merger could adequately impact the market in a way that will hurt consumers and intends to file an antitrust complaint.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By David Keene
Conference showed that the values Reagan cherished still endure
- FCC targets black conservative in TV station fight
- Hillary Clinton campaign received funds from Jeffrey Thompson
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- President Obama goes 'Between Two Ferns' to pitch Obamacare
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- EDITORIAL: Senate Democrats pointless all-night global warming talkathon
- CPAC 2014: Despite Ben Carson's speech, gay marriage mostly took a back seat at CPAC
- CARNES: Kissinger's flawed and offensive analysis of Ukraine
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Hard-fought congressional election in Florida is seen as a bellwether
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again