LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hoping for a ‘Saudi solution’ in Syria

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

With the exception of Iran and Egypt (where the army appears to be effectively re-establishing control), there is no situation in the Middle East more potentially dangerous than the Syrian civil war.

These are the various possibilities for Syria, in reverse order of likelihood: Installation of a secular, democratic regime (this isn’t going to happen) or the current regime survives, with or without leader Bashir Assad (possible but unlikely). The demons of sectarianism have been unleashed, which will, in all likelihood, lead to a Sunni government, most probably Wahhabi.

The Saudis have actively supported the rebels and would love to establish a Wahhabi outpost in the northern Arab world. This is a major opportunity for them. Should such a development occur, the big losers would be Iran and Hezbollah. It would be good for the Lebanese government and for Israel, since it would mean a regime heavily influenced by a country informally allied with Israel against Iran.

A Muslim-Brotherhood-run or Salafist-ruled government is the most likely development, however. Such a Syria would break its alliance with Iran and Hezbollah, but also be unremittingly hostile to Israel and negative for Lebanon and Syria’s own minorities.

Outside forces can influence the result only to a certain extent. Iran and Russia support the current Alawite regime, which is probably doomed. Saudi Arabia and Qatar support the rebels. Turkey, Israel, Lebanon, Jordan, Europe and America look on. Of the likely outcomes - both fundamentalist Sunni - the “Saudi solution” is preferable for many reasons.

NORMAN A. BAILEY

President

Institute for Global Economic Growth

Washington

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
TWT Video Picks
You Might Also Like
  • Maureen McDonnell looks on as her husband, former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, made a statement on Tuesday after the couple was indicted on corruption charges. (associated press)

    PRUDEN: Where have the big-time grifters gone?

  • This photo taken Jan. 9, 2014,  shows New Jersey Gov. Chris Christie gesturing as he answers a question during a news conference  at the Statehouse in Trenton.  Christie will propose extending the public school calendar and lengthening the school day in a speech he hopes will help him rebound from an apparent political payback scheme orchestrated by key aides. The early front-runner for the 2016 Republican presidential nomination will make a case Tuesday Jan. 14, 2014, that children who spend more time in school graduate better prepared academically, according to excerpts of his State of the State address obtained by The Associated Press. (AP Photo/Mel Evans)

    BRUCE: Bombastic arrogance or humble determination? Chris Christie’s choice

  • ** FILE ** Secretary of State Hillary Rodham testifies on Capitol Hill in Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 23, 2013, before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearing on the deadly September attack on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, that killed Ambassador J. Chris Stevens and three other Americans. (AP Photo/Pablo Martinez Monsivais, File)

    PRUDEN: The question to haunt the West

  • Get Breaking Alerts