- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
- Pro-marijuana group claims responsibility for Brooklyn Bridge flag swap
- Young adults shun Obamacare mostly due to cost: survey
- Stabbing attack on transgender girl, 15, was ‘bias motivated,’ police say
- LGBT adults still lean overwhelmingly toward Democratic Party
- Lawmakers rattled by Syria genocide horrors, call on Obama to act
Lawmakers close to deal on highways, student loans
Republicans give in on proposed pipeline
Question of the Day
Congressional leaders were poised Wednesday to reach a deal on stalled legislation to keep federal transportation, transit and rail projects running, as House Republican leaders prepared to bow to Democratic pressure to exclude a provision for a controversial oil pipeline.
The compromise to fund transportation projects through September 2014 was expected to be finalized by midnight in time for a Friday vote. The measure would be merged with a bill to keep federally subsidized student loan rates from doubling — a move designed to streamline their approval ahead of end-of-month deadlines for both.
Republicans appeared willing to give up demands that the so-called “highway bill” include a provision for the proposed Keystone XL pipeline, which would bring oil from Alberta, Canada, to Steele City, Neb. It has strong support from business and labor groups but sparked a backlash from environmentalists and some property rights advocates.
Republicans had pushed hard for Keystone, saying it would create thousands of jobs and foster greater domestic energy independence. Most Democrats are adamant about leaving the pipeline out of the measure, saying it’s unrelated to transportation issues.
Democrats in return are expected to give up certain environmental reviews of highway projects and drop calls for a program that funds bike paths, pedestrian safety projects, beautification and other “transportation enhancements.”
The deal would keep spending levels in the transportation component of the bill at current levels.
Highway bills, which often run for five years, typically move through Congress without great controversy. And in March, a two-year, $109 billion version sailed through the Senate with broad bipartisan support.
But efforts to renew surface transportation funding sputtered this winter in the House, where Republicans rejected their leadership’s five-year, $260 billion version before the measure could even get to the floor for a vote. Funding for surface transportation projects was to expire at the end of March before Congress passed a three-month extension.
Pressure on lawmakers had intensified in recent weeks, however, with federal transportation funding set to expire Sunday. Members of both parties were eager to avoid a politically precarious shutdown of highway projects — and the loss of construction jobs.
House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chairman John L. Mica, Florida Republican, praised the deal, calling it “unprecedented” because he said it doesn’t include any earmarks — lawmaker-requested pet projects — or tax increases.
“This legislation is specifically designed to reform and consolidate our transportation programs, streamline the bureaucratic project process and give states more flexibility to save taxpayers’ hard-earned money,” he said.
Sen. Barbara Boxer, California Democrat who co-authored the initial Senate version, said she was glad House Democrats and Republicans met “half way.”
“We speed up project delivery, cut red tape and do it without jeopardizing environmental laws,” she said. “Our country needs the kind of economic boost that this bill offers.”
Meanwhile, the package’s student loan component calls for maintaining the current 3.4 percent interest rate on federally subsidized Stafford loans for another year. The rate is scheduled to double unless Congress acts before Sunday.
Stopping the rate increase would save 7.4 million students an average of $1,000 a year — a move called for by President Obama in his State of the Union address this year. The $6 billion loan subsidy would be paid for by curbing companies’ tax breaks for pension payments and limiting federal subsidies of student loans to six years for college undergraduates.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Sean Lengell covers Congress and national politics and can be reached at email@example.com.
- GOP tests Democrats on college loan issue
- Lawmakers outside intelligence loop get miffed about briefing structure in Congress
- John Boehner: Time is right to bring latest farm bill to House floor
- Supreme Court nears rulings on key voting rights cases
- N.J. Gov. Christie picks state A.G. to fill U.S. Senate seat
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
By James A. Lyons Jr.
The president has shifted alliance from friend to enemy
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Army's 3-D printed bombs to create 'a whole new universe' of lethal capabilities
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- GOP leaders delay border bill, leave Obama in control
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- CIA admits improperly hacking Senate computers in search of Bush-era information
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Lois Lerner hated conservatives, new emails show
- Catholic League slams Obama: 'Do Christian lives mean so little to you?'
- U.S. troops told not to eat, drink in front of Muslims during Ramadan
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world