- Chinese man fed up with his girlfriend’s shopping jumps to his death
- Ukraine leader to talk with protesters; Washington urges caution
- Pope Francis: A nun saved my life
- Israeli P.M. Netanyahu backs out of Mandela funeral
- Elian Gonzalez makes first trip outside Cuba since custody battle
- U.S., British intelligence agents enter online sci-fi world to spy on gamers
- Sarah Palin to host the outdoors show ‘Amazing America’
- CIA admits $3 billion intelligence operation was a flop
- ‘127 Hours’ author Aron Lee Ralston, who amputated arm in canyon, arrested in Denver
- Men posing as cops break into home of former deputy
Supreme Court ready for ‘high theater’ with health care ruling
Judgment Day has finally arrived in Washington for President Obama and his health care law, which after two long years of court battles will earn a final legal decision Thursday from the nine justices on the Supreme Court.
At stake is the chief domestic accomplishment of Mr. Obama’s term in office — a plan to extend coverage to millions of uninsured Americans — and the court’s verdict will determine the limits of government powers in a 21st-century economy.
The White House, members of Congress, health care stakeholders and activists on both sides spent Wednesday refining their talking points, lining up legal professionals to offer rapid-fire analysis the instant the court releases its decision, and putting the final touches on a slew of news conferences, conference calls and tweets they have scheduled in the aftermath.
In the world of Washington, it’s the most momentous day in years.
“In one sense, this is just a decision,” said Neil Trautwein, vice president of the National Retail Federation, a group that opposes the law. “In another sense, it’s a collision of the three branches of government, so it’s high theater.”
Anticipation has been building for a month as the clock ticked down to the end of the Supreme Court’s 2011-12 session. The justices even extended their scheduled time in Washington through Thursday, so the decision is announced on the last day possible.
The chief question before the court is whether it will strike down the law’s individual mandate compelling most Americans to have health insurance. But the justices face other complex questions if they strike it down, including how much of the rest of the law can survive without its centerpiece. They also will decide whether states can refuse to massively expand their Medicaid programs without losing all federal funding.
Expected to be released midmorning, the ruling could be enormously complex, as many of the justices are expected to write their own opinions in a case expected to set the tone for federal power this century.
If the court upholds the law, congressional Republicans will be back to square one in their crusade to wipe out the entire thing. If the court strikesthe mandate but upholds the rest of the law, health insurance premiums likely will skyrocket. If justices overturn most of the law, it will leave the Obama administration with a major salvage job in a high-pressure election year.
No matter what the outcome, both sides will be feverishly working to win the messaging war.
The Cato Institute is sending nine people, including three constitutional scholars, to the Supreme Court building. It will be a challenge to quickly skim possibly hundreds of pages of opinions so they can deliver on-scene analysis, spokesman Chris Kennedy said.
“Obviously, our goal is to give our guys the opportunity to look at the opinion and deliver an informed opinion,” Mr. Kennedy said. “I’ll be honest, it’s going to be tough.”
The libertarian-leaning think tank also has staff waiting in the wings to write op-eds for the next day’s newspapers and has scheduled a forum Monday afternoon where legal analysts will discuss the outcome.
Dozens of others have planned similar responses.
The Service Employees International Union and Healthcare For America Now will deliver reactions from consumer advocates and nurses. Members of the House Republican Doctor’s Caucus will gather outside the Capitol to offer their take in the afternoon. Young pro-life activists plan to gather on the courthouse steps to rally against the health care law early in the morning.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- A familiar fading feeling for McMahon in Connecticut
- Romney’s bid to undo health law faces hurdles
- Hill GOP presses Medicare probe
- Romney, Obama advisors butt heads over binders, Big Bird and “Romnesia”
- Outsiders abide by rules in Brown-Warren race
Latest Blog Entries
By Brahma Chellaney
Beijing's creeping aggression signals a challenge to U.S. presence in the Asian Pacific
- CURL: Obama tells a whopper on IRS scandal
- WOLF: The president's other Obamacare lies
- Tech companies call for an end to NSA online snooping
- Lawmakers see 'false narrative' of Obama as a terrorist fighter
- Satanists petition for statue at Oklahoma Statehouse
- Obama lied about Syrian chemical attack, 'cherry-picked' intelligence: report
- Ted Cruz sees legal landmines ahead for Obamacare
- MSNBC host: Obamacare a 'wealthy white men' racist word
- WWII vet, 90, en route to Pearl Harbor event booted from flight
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Brazen, leading-edge, “call it like it is” columns and reporting from Ohio native, radio host and writer, Sara Marie Brenner.
Let’s talk about everything, especially the absurdity of it all
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
Never apologetic. Never afraid. Lieutenant Colonel Allen B. West joins Communities to bring tales from the biggest Foxhole of them all, the one inside the Beltway.
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow