- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Coping with IED threat
Rowan Scarborough’s article, “U.S. troops winning war against IEDs of Taliban” (Page 1, May 25), brings attention to the reality of 21st-century warfare; however, he does not accurately capture the breadth of the threat and the coordinated efforts to ensure our commanders have freedom of maneuver.
The IEDs (improvised explosive devices) and the networks that use them are a significant threat not only to our security forces, but also to our homeland. Today and in the future, U.S. forces will operate in an IED environment. The Defense Department has developed and rapidly deployed a comprehensive portfolio of capabilities - from mine rollers, hand-held detectors and pelvic protection garments to aerial- and ground-surveillance systems, to name a few. We do not rely on just one capability - our troops are provided an arsenal of tools to customize and apply to the IED threat.
One of the greatest challenges in Afghanistan is homemade explosives. Eighty-six percent of IEDs employed against our troops are homemade bombs, and the vast majority are made with calcium ammonium nitrate - a legally produced and widely used agricultural fertilizer. As Mr. Scarborough reported, these devices have been the greatest source of battlefield casualties this decade.
However, I would be remiss if I did not shed light on the global nature of this threat. Homemade explosives are not confined to Afghanistan. More than 500 IED incidents occur around the world each month. Because of the global nature of this threat, we have enlisted the help of our U.S. government partners, allies, industry and congressional leaders such as Rep. Duncan Hunter.
One thing I know is, the Defense Department cannot address the IED threat alone. The work to disrupt IED networks and to defeat the IED itself is a comprehensive effort that must continue to occur at all levels. We are never going to stop all IEDs, but with a holistic and decisive approach, we will significantly impact the effect the IED has on the battle space and here at home.
LT. GEN. MICHAEL D. BARBERO
Director, Joint Improvised Explosive Device Defeat Organization, U.S. Army
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By Tammy Bruce
Get Breaking Alerts
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- BRUCE: Obama's bizarre immigration rules
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- IRS to turn over Lerner emails in tea party targeting probe
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Unemployment insurance vote could happen next week
- PRUDEN: Likening Putin to Hitler on Ukraine shows Hillary's shaky grasp of history
- DELAY: A revolution for the Constitution
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's flawed Mideast 'peace' plan
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Foreign policy would distract Obama from social hour
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Hit Putin where it hurts over Ukraine