- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Eric Cantor says he’ll resign on Aug. 18
- Ted Nugent slams ‘lying freaks’ at liberal media: I’m ‘doing God’s work’
- Joe Biden’s secret love: Skinny-dipping, Secret Service agents say
- Just-forged Israel-Hamas cease-fire ends in rocket fire
- Obama military downsizing leaves U.S. too weak to counter global threats, panel finds
- Sen. Tom Coburn vows to slow down budget-busting bills ahead of recess
- Obama fantasizes about more executive power, signs new order on federal contractors
- Clintons call Klein, Halper, Kessler ‘a Hat Trick of despicable actors’: report
- Boehner accuses Obama of ‘legacy of lawlessness’
EDITORIAL: The Sebelius savings plan
When fewer human beings are better
Question of the Day
There's something perverse about a government $15.5 trillion in the red espousing a strategy to "save money" by discouraging the birth of human beings. That's what Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius is advocating through the implementation of President Obama's contraception mandate.
Earlier this month, Mrs. Sebelius told a House panel probing the president's fiscal 2013 budget that the mandate won't impose a financial burden on employers and insurance companies because the cost of contraceptives and sterilizations will be balanced by lower medical costs from fewer births: "The reduction in the number of pregnancies compensates for the cost of contraception," she told the House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee on Health.
"So you are saying, by not having babies born, we are going to save money on health care?" asked an incredulous Rep. Tim Murphy, Pennsylvania Republican. "Providing contraception is a critical preventive health benefit for women and for their children," replied Mrs. Sebelius, retreating behind policy boilerplate. "Not having babies born is a critical benefit?" asked Mr. Murphy. "This is absolutely amazing to me."
The secretary's testimony reveals a diabolical view of the mission of Health and Human Services. For the agency, a human being now represents little more than a debit entry on a balance sheet. In other words, the fewer, the better. Accordingly, Uncle Sam recommends insurers achieve savings by preventing babies from being born and winding up in the expense column.
The Obama administration has a plan to save money at the end of life as well: Obamacare, the president's venture into socialized medicine, has established an Independent Payment Advisory Board, which is empowered to ration expenses paid by Medicare for the health care costs of elderly Americans. Inevitably, efficiencies will come from denial of treatment. For the very ill, that could spell death.
Obama health policy reveals its roots in secular humanism, a philosophy based on reason alone that rejects the existence of the spiritual. With this mindset, it's easy to view human beings as commodities with a price tag. That perspective stands in stark contrast to religious tradition familiar to Americans, which contends that individuals are fashioned in the image of the divine. People are, the Founders believed, "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights." When human beings are commoditized, then birth is no longer a miracle of life but akin to a date of manufacture. Death resembles an expiration date, and both are viewed as events to be managed.
It's no wonder that religious organizations are up in arms over the Obama contraception mandate. The Catholic Church in particular considers contraception alien to a fundamental understanding of the sanctity of life. Enforcement of the rule against church institutions would be a clear violation of their First Amendment right to free exercise of religion.
If Kathleen Sebelius sees her job as saving money by discouraging life, then she needs a new title: secretary of health and human prevention.
The Washington Times
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Take a first look at The Washington Times' new dynamic website
- 'Standing by Israel' special report
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ventura's court win is really a loss
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Ukraine is not so easily understood
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Reagan didn't deregulate airlines
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Both parties recognize the Democrats' scam
Get Breaking Alerts
- Inside the Ring: Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Israel surprised by Hamas tunnel network
- PRUDEN: Cooling the manufactured impeachment panic
- Chicken pox outbreak puts illegal immigrant facility on lockdown
- 'Big Bang' star Mayim Bialik helps send bulletproof vests to IDF
- Congress leaves Obama holding the burden of border children
- Just-forged Israel-Hamas 3-day cease-fire ends in rocket fire
- Islamic militants seize Benghazi as U.S. evacuates Libya
- 3 African leaders cancel trip to U.S. over Ebola outbreak; Obama still plans summit
- EDITORIAL: Pols' misrepresentations fuel public's cynicism about politics
- EDITORIAL: 'Operation Choke Point': A noose for business
- EDITORIAL: For too many gays, 'tolerance' is a one-way street
- EDITORIAL: The real Lois Lerner exposed in newly released emails
- EDITORIAL: Meriam Ibrahim's happy immigrant story