- Kentucky city called socialist for buying gas station, undercutting competitor fuel prices
- Israel hits five mosques, sports complex in overnight Gaza strikes
- Hillary Clinton dogged for refusing reporters’ questions on book tour
- EPA tweet baffles: ‘I’m now a C-List celebrity in Kim Kardashian: Hollywood’ iPhone game
- Australian P.M. Abbott: MH17 evidence tampered with on ‘industrial scale’
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez tells Hispanics to vote and ‘punish those’ who oppose amnesty
- Country singer Tim McGraw not sorry for slapping female fan: ‘Things happen’
- Iraq vet cited for owning 14 therapeutic pet ducks
- White House takes credit for drop in unaccompanied children at border
- International crises be damned, Obama’s fundraising trip must go on
RICH: Obamacare costs skyrocket, even pre-launch
Government can’t run health system better than the market
Question of the Day
The stated objective of President Obama’s socialized medicine law is to expand access to quality, affordable health care in America - hence the statute’s title, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act.
As far as intended outcomes are concerned, greater access to lower-cost health insurance is certainly a desirable objective. Shrinking the ranks of the uninsured would produce a contraction of America’s welfare state, thus reducing taxpayer obligations associated with dependency. Meanwhile, lowering health care costs would create more disposable income, thereby stimulating the nation’s consumer economy.
Clearly, these outcomes will not be achieved by Obamacare, though. Instead, this Orwellian nightmare will have precisely the opposite effect - dramatically increasing federal outlays (by an estimated $2.5 trillion in its first decade) while limiting disposable income on multiple fronts, not the least of which is its estimated $500 billion in tax increases.
Like most unnecessary expansions of government, Obamacare doesn’t achieve its objective of “affordable” coverage, either. As Obamacare’s first round of mandates and tax hikes kicked in last year, family health care costs soared by 9 percent. According to projections released by the Office of the Actuary for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, net health care costs for 2014 - the first full year of the law’s implementation - will increase by 14 percent.
Why is this happening? Because Obamacare is based upon several fatally flawed assumptions - most notably that government can run the health care industry better than the free market.
According to the Obama administration, new taxes, bureaucracies, regulations and entitlement obligations are the keys to making health care less expensive. Such a premise - like other big-government machinations - is illogical on its face. Honestly, are we to believe that a country that is already struggling to afford these costs will be magically able to manage them once the weight of this Orwellian nightmare has been placed on our health care system?
“If you think health care is expensive now, wait until you see what it costs when it’s free,” P.J. O’Rourke famously said nearly two decades ago.
Sadly, America is about to find out that cost.
Obamacare contains at least 20 tax hikes - including the insidious “individual-mandate excise tax,” which would impose a surtax on Americans who fail to purchase health insurance from a “qualifying” provider. There is also an employer excise tax, a job-killing surtax on investment, Medicaid payroll tax increases and numerous other levies.
Since we know that these tax hikes (and the mountain of deficit spending that accompanies them) aren’t “purchasing” lower health care costs for Americans, what are taxpayers spending all of that money on?
That’s easy - vast layers of new and expanded bureaucracies.
Obamacare creates no fewer than 159 new programs - a mammoth expansion of an already bloated federal government that will result in the hiring of thousands upon thousands of new taxpayer-funded employees.
This year, for example, the Internal Revenue Service requested nearly $400 million in additional funding to hire 1,054 new employees. Why? Because, according to the agency, Obamacare “represents the largest set of tax law changes in more than 20 years, with more than 40 provisions that amend the tax laws.”
Among the items included in the IRS request: $30 million to “administer new fees” on insurers, $11 million to “promote compliance” with Obamacare’s new tanning salon tax and $10 million to “strengthen oversight” of those medical facilities fortunate enough to be exempt from the law’s most onerous provisions.
In addition to ballooning budgets at existing bureaucracies, Obamacare creates dozens of new ones - ranging from the swarm of agencies tasked with implementing its statewide health care “exchanges” to dozens of smaller councils, committees and grant programs such as the “Indian youth life skills demonstration project” and the “demonstration projects for nursing facilities involved in the culture change movement.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
Get Breaking Alerts
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- Jewish woman booted from JetBlue flight over fight with Palestinian
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- PRUDEN: A deadly enemy within exacerbating immigration crisis
- Edward Snowden to work with Russia on anti-spy technology
- MERRY: Handicaps in Hillary's way
- U.S. scrambles as violence escalates in Israel-Hamas conflict
- Humanists seek support from Congress on military chaplains
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado
- Big milestone for Britain's little prince