- Marionville mayor ‘kind of agreed’ with Kansas City shooter’s views
- Rev. Al Sharpton’s Easter message: Politically ‘crucified’ Obama has risen again
- Supreme Court to weigh challenge to ban on campaign lies
- UNICEF launches ‘Mr. Poo’ mascot in India to curb public defecation
- Teen taking selfie by train: ‘Wow, that guy just kicked me in the head’
- Goodbye, Afghanistan — hello, Africa: Air Force to shift as U.S. exits Middle East
- Iran mulls ban on vasectomies, decrease on abortions to bolster population
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers ‘more deadly than jihadists’
- Classes resume at high school rocked by stabbings
- ABC News accuses Center for Public Integrity of stealing Pulitzer-winning work
Options for cervical cancer check depend on age
WASHINGTON (AP) - Forget one-size-fits-all advice: Guidelines out Wednesday give women choices for cervical cancer testing that depend on their age.
Once recommended every year, many major medical groups have long said that a Pap test every three years is the best way to screen most women, starting at age 21 and ending at 65.
But starting at age 30, you could choose to be tested for the cancer-causing HPV virus along with your Pap _ and get checked every five years instead, say separate guidelines issued by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American Cancer Society and some other organizations.
It’s not a requirement _ women 30 and over could stick with the every-three-years Pap and do fine, the guidelines say.
But if they choose the newer Pap-plus-HPV option and the results of both tests are negative, the guidelines conclude it’s safe to wait a bit longer than previously recommended for the next cervical check. That’s because certain strains of HPV, the human papillomavirus, cause most cervical cancer, but the infection has to persist for a number of years to do its damage.
The cancer society already said women 30 and older could use both tests, but draft recommendations issued last fall by the task force, which advises the government, didn’t include that option. The task force has since reviewed additional evidence and rewrote its final guidelines so that the medical groups now agree.
The question is whether doctors will follow the recommendations. Already, studies have shown that too many doctors are giving younger women routine HPV tests, contrary to long-standing advice. Even patients have wondered if it’s really OK not to get a yearly screening.
It is, and better understanding of how cervical cancer grows makes that clear, Dr. Jeffrey Peipert, a gynecologist at Washington University in St. Louis, wrote in an editorial in Annals of Internal Medicine assessing the guidelines.
“More frequent screening than recommended not only offers no benefit, but it can cause harm,” Peipert wrote. He concluded: “We should embrace the guidelines.”
Cervical cancer grows so slowly that regular Pap smears _ which examine cells scraped from the cervix _ can find signs early enough to treat before a tumor even forms. Today, about half of all cervical cancer is diagnosed in women who’ve never been screened, or have gone many years between checks, Peipert noted.
HPV tests can add an extra layer of information, if they’re used correctly. Routine HPV screening is not for women younger than 30, the guidelines stress. HPV is a super-common virus in younger women and their bodies usually clear the infection on their own.
The advice for younger women has long been to get HPV testing only if a Pap signals a possible problem.
A Pap averages around $40; HPV tests can add another $50 to $100.
The new guidelines are aimed at otherwise healthy women, not those at high risk of cervical cancer. They also say:
_A stand-alone HPV test, without a Pap, isn’t recommended.
TWT Video Picks
By John R. Bolton
Reality calls for attaching Gaza to Egypt and the West Bank to Jordan
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- HURT: Wilson and Obama ... 100 years apart, but so alike
- Rand and Ron Paul ride to the rescue for Bundy in Nevada standoff with feds
- IRS emails reveal discussion with Justice about suing nonprofits for election activities
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- CNN op-ed claims right-wingers 'more deadly than jihadists'
- GOP writes legislation to deny Attorney General Eric Holder his salary
- WEBER: Obamacare cuts home healthcare for millions of seniors
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.