- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- Neal Boortz defends Hillary Clinton for representing child rapist
- House task force to recommend National Guard on border, faster deportations
- Top federal judge uses pizza to explain complex Obamacare situation
- Obama, Biden overhaul job training programs
- Drought-plagued Californians turn to paint to keep lawns green
- ISIL now forcing Iraqi shopkeepers to veil mannequins in Mosul
- 11 parents of Nigeria’s abducted girls die
- Genetic mapping triggers new hope on schizophrenia
- Turkish P.M. Erdogan won’t speak to Obama, but he’ll take calls from Biden
MILLER: Dare to Mediscare
Conservatives offer bold entitlement solution in an election year
Question of the Day
The conventional wisdom in Washington is that nothing significant will be done until after the November election. As the country racks up debt at a pace faster than ever in history, a few lawmakers refuse to just sit back, avoiding controversy. They want to tackle the biggest driver of red ink, Medicare, and do it this year.
"We are not willing to wait until after the next election to fix entitlements," said freshman Sen. Rand Paul in announcing his legislation on Thursday. The Kentucky Republican was joined by his Republican cosponsors Sen. Jim DeMint and Sen. Lindsey Graham, both of South Carolina, and fellow freshman Sen. Mike Lee of Utah. Their proposal would give seniors access to the same health care plans as members of Congress.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi has called any reform an attempt to "end the Medicare guarantee" and let the health care program "wither on the vine." While Democrats use "Mediscare" tactics to block worthy efforts to tackle this crisis, they could be disarmed with better public relations. "The president and Harry Reid have been licking their chops for over three years waiting for Republicans to actually try to deal with the large problems like Medicare," said Mr. DeMint. "But I think if Americans find out the truth about what we're doing, it will be a very big positive for Republicans in the fall."
Dr. Paul's bill would shutter the current overpriced and underserved Medicare system that is on a path to go bankrupt in only eight years. In its place, seniors will have better quality health care for less cost by choosing among the 250 health insurance plans that federal employees now use. The average senior would have three-quarters of his premium subsidized by the government and save $1,500 a year in out-of-pocket costs.
Competition and choice will bring down costs, as will slowly raising the eligibility age to 70 over 20 years. The Medicare Board of Trustees reported that the current program has unfunded liabilities of $37 trillion over a 75-year window. This bill would lower the trajectory of projected costs enough to cut that liability by almost half, $16 trillion. It would also save $1 trillion over the first 10 years in reduced costs.
Last year, House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan proposed the concept of premium support, which encourages competition by providing vouchers for seniors to apply to a choice of private plans. Democrats launched an all-out attack on Mr. Ryan, hoping that would end any debate in Washington on entitlement reform. Republican presidential candidate Mitt Romney proposed a more politically palatable version offering individuals a choice of a voucher or remaining in the current Medicare system.
Unlike Mr. Romney's and Mr. Ryan's plans, this GOP reform does actually end Medicare as we know it, and that's a good thing. By giving seniors preset and pre-screened options, it removes much of the fear of being forced to find their own plans in the marketplace. Giving the public access to their same gold-standard plans takes away the fear of diminished quality. As Mr. Graham said, "If it's good enough for your senator, it's good enough for you."
Emily Miller is a senior editor for the Opinion pages at The Washington Times.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Emily Miller is senior editor of opinion for The Washington Times. She is the author of “Emily Gets Her Gun … But Obama Wants to Take Yours” (Regnery 2013). Miller won the 2012 Clark Mollenhoff Award for Investigative Reporting from the Institute on Political Journalism.
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek tax investigation follows D.C. conviction for muzzleloader bullet ammunition
- MILLER: Harry Reid's hypocrisy on 'Equal Pay Day': No women on top leadership staff
- MILLER: Maryland bathroom bill for transgenders is part of LGBT lobby for sex-change rights
- MILLER: Mark Witaschek surrenders to D.C. police 'Gun Offenders Registry'
- MILLER: Michelle Obama has media blackout in China while touting freedom of press
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
U.S. appetite for drugs begets violence migrants are fleeing
Get Breaking Alerts
- IRS seeks help destroying another 3,200 computer hard drives
- D.C. appeals panel deals big blow to Obamacare subsidies
- 'Straight White Guy Festival' supposedly set for Ohio park
- Hamas terrorists wear Israeli army uniforms to ambush soldiers in Gaza
- Tony Dungy doubles down on Michael Sam remarks: 'Drafting him would bring much distraction'
- Beretta moving to Tennessee over Maryland gun laws
- DEACE: How to go from civil rights icon to bigot in one quote
- YOUNG: A sinking presidency, deeper after November?
- LYONS: Small-arms treaty, big Second Amendment threat
- Rep. Jared Polis' anti-fracking crusade riles Colorado