Overlooked Hoyas overachieved

Question of the Day

Is it still considered bad form to talk politics during a social gathering?

View results

COLUMBUS, Ohio — In the searing pain of their final moments together, right down to the miserable trudge out of the locker room every basketball team without a net-cutting ceremony to cap its season inevitably takes, it wasn’t hard for Georgetown to look back.

To the bonding of its offseason trip to China that proved more eventful than anyone might have guessed thanks to a brawl.

To the preseason prognostications pegging the Hoyas to finish a meager 10th in the 16-team Big East.

To how, in a manner acutely felt across the roster, Georgetown lived up to its tradition even if it bowed out of the NCAA tournament earlier than it hoped.

“The only people who believed in us this whole season were the guys in this room,” senior guard Jason Clark said. “We weren’t picked to do anything this year. People doubted us, but I think we worked hard for the success that we got.”

That is an understatement.

It was easy enough to frame the 66-63 loss to N.C. State on Sunday as the latest postseason calamity for the Hoyas (24-9). And on the surface, a fourth consecutive NCAA appearance ending with a loss to double-digit seed (Georgetown was a No. 3 seed, N.C. State a No. 11) fits the narrative.

But look back at those seasons and measure the initial expectations, however flawed they were. The 2008 team was ranked fifth in the preseason, remained in the top 10 much of the winter and were downed in the round of 32. The 2010 and 2011 outfits began their seasons at No. 20 and remained mainstays in the national polls.

Even the 2009 bunch that stumbled to an NIT appearance was ranked until the end of January.

These guys? Nary a vote in either major preseason poll.

“For 10 underclassmen, I think we did a great job, but it’s still not enough,” sophomore guard Markel Starks said.

Perhaps not right now. Yet unlike their immediate predecessors, there was no sign of severe slippage in late January and February. Instead, the Hoyas simply plugged along, winning two and losing one with remarkable steadiness over the final five weeks of the regular season.

Much of the credit could be placed on Clark and Henry Sims, the veterans who ultimately defined their careers not based on the program’s past disappointments but instead with virtuoso senior seasons.

Clark was long the overlooked backcourt component, but still a proven entity. He wrapped up his career with 1,363 points, 20th in school history and just shy of former teammate Chris Wright’s 1,369.

Sims, meanwhile, was a revelation as the nexus of the Hoyas’ offense after three years as a rotational reserve, and his absence was acutely felt when he encountered foul trouble Sunday.

Story Continues →

View Entire Story

© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.

Comments
blog comments powered by Disqus
Get Adobe Flash player