THE HAGUE — A still life once thought to be by Vincent van Gogh but later downgraded to the work of an anonymous artist because of doubts about its authenticity is indeed by the tormented Dutch impressionist, researchers said Tuesday.
The process leading to the confirmation reads like a cold-case detective story, with a new X-ray technique helping experts re-examine what they already knew about the painting and draw on a growing pool of scholarly Van Gogh research.
A detailed X-ray of an underlying painting of two wrestlers and knowledge of the painter's period at a Belgian art academy combined to lead a team of researchers to conclude that "Still Life With Meadow Flowers and Roses" really is by Van Gogh.
The painting is owned by the Kroeller-Mueller Museum in the central Netherlands and was being hung there Tuesday among its other van Gogh works.
There was no real "eureka" moment for the team of experts studying the still life and the underlying image of wrestlers, said Louis van Tilborgh, a senior researcher at Amsterdam's Van Gogh Museum who took part in the confirmation process.
"All the pieces just fell into place," he told the Associated Press in a telephone interview.
The painting, on a 40-inch-by-31-inch canvas, was bought by the Kroeller-Mueller Museum in 1974 as a van Gogh. The work was thought to come from the artist's period living with his brother Theo in Paris from late 1886.
"But when they hung it [in the museum], doubts crept in" about its authenticity, Mr. van Tilborgh said.
Experts thought the canvas was too large for that period, the depiction of a vase brimming over with flowers and yet more flowers lying on a table in the foreground was too exuberant, too busy. The signature was in an unusual position for van Gogh - the top right-hand corner.
With the doubts piling up, the museum in 2003 decided to attribute the painting to an anonymous artist instead of to van Gogh.
The detective work did not end there, however.
An X-ray taken five years earlier already had revealed an indistinct image of the wrestlers and continued to interest researchers.
Now, a new, more detailed X-ray has shown the wrestlers in more detail, along with the brush strokes and pigments used. They all pointed back to van Gogh.
"You can see the wrestlers more clearly and the fact that they are wearing loin cloths," Mr. van Tilborgh said.
Having models pose half naked was a defining characteristic of the Antwerp academy where van Gogh studied in early 1886. So was the size of the canvas, the Kroeller-Mueller Museum said in a statement.
Vincent wrote to his brother about needing the large canvas, new brushes and paint. Theo helped the penniless artist buy the materials and a week later van Gogh wrote back that he was delighted with the painting of two wrestlers.
Mr. van Tilborgh said the brush strokes and pigments in the wrestlers painting also corresponded with what experts now know about van Gogh's work in Antwerp.
The wrestlers also help explain the "uncharacteristic exuberance" of the floral still life, the Kroeller-Mueller Museum statement said - van Gogh had to cover up all of the old image with his new work.
The detective work is described in a new publication by the Van Gogh Museum titled "Rehabilitation of a Flower Still Life in the Kroeller-Mueller Museum and a Lost Antwerp Painting by Van Gogh."