- ISIL creates all-female brigade to terrorize women into following Sharia law
- ISTOOK: Obama wants to be impeached
- Obama to Latin leaders: Help with border
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring ‘God’s Rescue Squad’
- ‘Pocket drones’: U.S. Army developing tiny surveillance tools for the next big war
- Belgian cafe posts sign: Dogs allowed, but Jews stay out
- Gen. Dempsey: Pentagon studying Russian readiness plans not viewed ‘for 20 years’
- John McCain: Botched, two-hour execution of murderer is ‘torture’
- House GOP ready to move border bill
- Bomb squad called after live WWII artillery washes on Cape Cod beach
Bolling decision on ties led to Va. budget stalemate
Lieutenant governor has no regrets about ‘measured opinion’
Question of the Day
RICHMOND — The groundwork for a lingering budget standoff in the General Assembly might well have been laid Jan. 3 — roughly a week before lawmakers were scheduled to arrive in town.
Democrats had filed a lawsuit about the tie-breaking authority of Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling, seeking to define his ability to cast votes on organizing the Senate, split evenly between 20 Democrats and 20 Republicans after the November elections. Lieutenant governors routinely break ties on bills, but could he vote on the budget? On the appointment of judges?
On Jan. 3, Mr. Bolling issued a memo declaring that he could cast tie-breaking votes on matters of organization but not on the budget. Nearly three months later, lawmakers gaveled in a special session Wednesday to begin work officially on a budget impasse that might not have occurred without that January decision.
The Republican lieutenant governor’s self-described “measured opinion” primed the pump for what was to unfold in the next two months. The GOP organized the Senate as an effective majority, Democrats voted in lock step to block two budgets, and now a small group of lawmakers is huddled in Richmond trying to work out a new two-year spending plan before the fiscal year ends June 30.
Despite the impasse, Mr. Bolling has no regrets about his decision.
“Senate Democrats said from Day One that they were going to obstruct the adoption of the budget, and they were going to obstruct the election of judges,” Mr. Bolling said. “And they said from Day One that they were going to do that because they didn’t like the way the Senate was organized.
“I thought that was a terribly irresponsible action for them to take. And my hope is that as time has progressed that they have seen that and have moved beyond that. We’ll see. I hope they have.”
Mr. Bolling acknowledged that he would have been justified in saying he could break a tie on the budget.
University of Virginia professor A.E. Dick Howard, who helped write the modern Virginia Constitution, said in an unofficial legal opinion in 1996 that the purview of the lieutenant governor on tiebreakers was virtually unlimited.
Mr. Bolling said Mr. Howard “basically opined that the lieutenant governor could vote on anything.” He said Democrats were ready to pounce on Mr. Howard’s opinion in 1996, the last time the chamber was evenly split, and push Lt. Gov. Donald S. Beyer Jr.’s authority even further than did Mr. Bolling before state Sen. Virgil Goode, Rocky Mount Democrat, threatened to bolt the Republican Party if a power-sharing agreement were not reached.
“I would suggest that we handled it much better than they intended to handle it in 1996, because I came out early on and said, ‘Look, I think there are things I can vote on and there are things I can’t vote on,’ ” he said. “I tried to be very fair in laying that on the table. I could have taken a more aggressive position relying on Dick Howard’s opinion, as they intended to do, but I chose not to do that because I just didn’t think that that opinion was right.”
Had he done so, there might be a budget in place by now - although there also could be pending legal challenges.
Senate Democratic caucus Chairman A. Donald McEachin, Henrico Democrat, had filed the lawsuit challenging Mr. Bolling’s authority to cast tie-breaking votes on matters of organization. A judge ruled in December that the matter was moot until a vote was cast, but Mr. McEachin still dropped it last month.
Mr. McEachin said he didn’t want to get into a hypothetical debate as to what might have happened had Mr. Bolling tried to use his tie-breaking vote in a more aggressive manner, such as insisting that he could cast the final vote to pass a budget.
“The fact is he didn’t,” Mr. McEachin said. “I think it’s always been fairly well settled that the majority of members elected means the majority of members elected.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell's trial to test definitions of political corruption
- Half can't name political party of their member of Congress, poll finds
- Mich. congressman returns Commerce award after group endorses opponent
- Rep. Henry Cuellar on border crisis: 'Playing defense on the one-yard line'
- Rep. Luis Gutierrez: Senate Dems wary of immigration politics
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By Mark Davis
The nation founders, the Lone Star State thrives
- Rahm Emanuel: Send illegal immigrant shelter kids to Chicago
- 'Pocket drones': U.S. Army developing tiny spies for the next big war
- Tactical advantage: Russian military shows off impressive new gear
- CURL: Obama, staffers not even pretending any more
- Pentagon running out of time to find mass of missing weapons in Afghanistan
- Family of Marine killed in Afghanistan pushes back against cover-up
- NAPOLITANO: What if our democracy is a fraud?
- Military bans troops from Baptist church event honoring 'God's Rescue Squad'
- WEST: Those who would rather join the jihadi army than their own nation's army
- Obama orders Pentagon advisers to Ukraine
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors
20 gadgets that changed the world
Fighting in Iraq