- Obama downplays IRS scandal, blames Obamacare rollout on ‘outdated’ agencies
- Pregnancies decline overall, up among older women
- Pentagon plans to destroy Syrian chemical arms on ship at sea
- Paris Metro issues ‘politeness manual’ to improve passengers’ behavior
- Justin Bieber, crew detained at Australian airport in drug search
- Lee Rigby trial: Muslim who machete-hacked soldier calls it ‘humane’ kill
- GM ending Chevy sales in Europe to focus on Opel and Vauxhall
- Putin’s diplomats to U.S. busted for living high life off $1.5M bilked from Medicaid
- Happy Meal: Couple goes to McDonald’s, leaves with bag packed with cash
- Boehner: It took me 3 to 4 hours to sign up for Obamacare
No $2 fee in pipeline for Md. gas utilities
Senate kills infrastructure charge
ANNAPOLIS — The Maryland Senate killed a bill Wednesday that would have allowed gas-utility companies to hit consumers with as much as a $2 monthly surcharge to pay for pipeline and infrastructure improvements.
The bipartisan measure was voted down 24-22, falling two votes short of passage after two days of debate in the 47-member chamber.
Opponents argued the bill would open the floodgates for providers wanting to raise prices and would further handicap residents facing a shaky economy and several tax and fee increases in this year’s General Assembly.
Gas companies would “know they’re going to get this money upfront and that they can spend whatever they want,” said Sen. Richard S. Madaleno Jr., Montgomery Democrat. “This is exactly what we complain about a bureaucracy doing. A bureaucracy is inefficient and doesn’t have the incentive to save money.”
Sponsors said the bill would have merely set restrictions on possible surcharges and given utility companies an incentive to repair aging and potentially dangerous gas pipelines by letting them raise extra funds during projects rather than the traditional method of requesting funds in the form of rate increases after completion.
Supporters also argued the bill could have actually saved money for utilities and ratepayers in the long run.
The end vote was somewhat surprising after the measure passed the House last week by a 111-15 vote.
Most senators acknowledged that infrastructure improvements can lead to higher energy bills, but split into two competing, nonpartisan factions on the issue of whether it’s better to impose such increases before or after the work is done.
Supporters argued an upfront surcharge would provide a more enticing funding method for utilities that are reluctant to take the risk of financing their own work and later asking the PSC for reimbursement in the form of rate increases.
They also contended the reduced upfront risk would help gas companies get better financing rates on projects and potentially pass the savings onto consumers.
“This is not a scheme to take money from ratepayers,” said Sen. Allan H. Kittleman, Howard Republican. “It’s just a pay-go mechanism to allow them to be billed and pay for it as it’s being built. I think it’s more efficient.”
Sen. John C. Astle, the bill’s lead sponsor, stressed that the PSC would have maintained oversight over any surcharge agreement and could have demanded repayment to consumers if companies were found to misuse funds.
Mr. Astle, Anne Arundel Democrat, added that the mechanism could have encouraged many providers to fix problems that have hurt efficiency and put the public in danger.
“Our whole infrastructure is really aging and starting to come apart,” he said. “The problem with the gas infrastructure is that it really presents a hazard because gas explodes.”
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Hill joined The Washington Times in February 2011 as a Maryland political reporter. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Md. drivers could face eventual doubling of gas tax
- Federal appeals court restores Maryland's concealed carry law
- Md. bill would end student suspensions for mimicking gun behavior
- Maryland Senate passes bill decriminalizing small amounts of marijuana
- Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell assailed on transportation
Latest Blog Entries
Why such hatred toward America's freedom of religion?
- 'Hunger Games' delivers Obama's message on income inequality: liberal group
- Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.
- Obama returns to class warfare as poll numbers plunge
- Hack attack: 2 million Facebook, Twitter passwords stolen
- U.S. drops 2,000 mice on Guam by parachute to kill snakes
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Russian diplomats busted bilking $1.5 million from Medicaid
- GOP launches candidate training: How to talk to women
- CARSON: Getting to the top by starting at the bottom
- 84 percent of the world population has faith; a third are Christian
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Criticism may not be agreeable, but it is necessary. It fulfills the same function as pain in the human body. It calls attention to an unhealthy state of things.
Understanding economic events with a free market explanation
John Wood illustrates a new American politics, and the path to get there.
Interviews and show reviews from the Los Angeles punk scene past and present. Los Angeles has always been rich in punk rock talent since punk rock was born.
White House pets gone wild!