- Egypt rights center raided, 2 Mubaraks acquitted
- New Mexico Supreme Court rules same-sex marriage constitutional
- Blame Bush: 5 years later, that’s still the mantra, pollsters find
- Dutch prostitutes demand same retirement benefits as soccer stars
- John McCain to Harry Reid: I’ll ‘kick the crap’ out of you
- Dogs that talk: Researchers seek $10K for ‘No More Woof’ technology
- 1,000 firefighters called to battle stubborn Big Sur wildfire
- Black Friday brouhaha: Millions of Target shoppers hit by credit card theft
- Britain orders airplane to rescue citizens from violent South Sudan
- Mega Millions winner emerges as Georgia mom, in ‘disbelief’
Senator rips misconduct in Stevens case
Question of the Day
The Democratic chairman and ranking Republican on the Senate Judiciary Committee said at a hearing Wednesday the prosecutorial misconduct uncovered by a special counsel in the Justice Department's prosecution of the late Alaska Sen. Ted Stevens cannot be tolerated.
"What happened in the Stevens case should not happen again, whether the defendant is prominent or an indigent defendant," said Sen. Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont Democrat and committee chairman. "Significant evidence was not disclosed to the defense and critical mistakes were made throughout the course of the trial that denied Sen. Stevens a fair opportunity to defend himself.
"The sloppiness, mistakes and poor decisions in connection with the Stevens case disturbed the judge hearing the case and disturb me," he said. "The Justice Department needs to ensure that such a situation is never repeated."
Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, the committee's ranking Republican, went a step further, adding that "a lot went wrong in the prosecution of Sen. Stevens” and yet “it seems nobody has been held accountable."
He said the committee had "an obligation to hold Justice accountable for what went wrong here and prevent it from happening again in the future."
Their comments came at a committee hearing on a court-ordered report on the botched Stevens prosecution.
The sole witness was Henry F. Schuelke III, the court-appointed special counsel who wrote a blistering 514-page report.
The Schuelke report, which the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts said cost nearly $1 million, said Justice Department lawyers bungled the investigation and prosecution, saying the probe was permeated by the “systematic concealment of significant exculpatory evidence.” It said evidence was withheld, some intentionally, that would have independently corroborated Stevens' defense and seriously damaged the credibility of the key witness against him.
Prosecutors are required to turn over exculpatory materials to the defense.
A jury convicted Stevens on Oct. 27, 2008, on seven felony counts of failing to disclose more than $250,000 worth of home renovations and other gifts, mainly from an Alaskan oil service company. A few days later, he narrowly lost a bid for re-election to Sen. Mark Begich, a Democrat. Stevens died in a plane crash in August 2010.
U.S. District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan threw out the case in April 2009 at the request of the Justice Department, which found after trial that exculpatory evidence had been withheld. Judge Sullivan appointed Mr. Schuelke to investigate six prosecutors involved in the investigation and trial.
"This is a sad story," Mr. Schuelke told the committee. "I took no joy in coming to this conclusion. I hope I never have to do it again." He said if prosecutors had disclosed some of the exculpatory information to the Stevens defense team, "it may well have affected the outcome of the trial."
"The motive to win the case was the principal operating motive," he said, adding that he did not think prosecutors acted out of "animus" to Stevens.
Mr. Schuelke also said while some of what happened was "broadly illegal," he could not bring criminal contempt charges against two prosecutors he thought had intentionally withheld exculpatory information because the judge had not specifically issued an order telling them to turn over such evidence. He said had an order been issued, he would have gone after the prosecutors for criminal contempt.
Mr. Grassley said that while Stevens' rights were intentionally violated, "it seems no one was held accountable." He said the Schuelke report contained "shocking statements that call into question the conduct of those involved in this prosecution, and threatens to resonate further throughout the Justice Department."
The Justice Department's office of professional responsibility is investigating the allegations.
© Copyright 2013 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
By Andrew P. Napolitano
Fourth Amendment says Obama is not at liberty to collect metadata
- Calling prison term disparities unfair, Obama commutes sentences for 8 crack offenders
- Homeland Security helps smuggle illegal immigrant children into the U.S.
- Gov't wasted $30 billion on 'pillownauts,' crystal goblets -- buying human urine!
- Armed response, not restrictive gun laws, brought swift end to school shooting
- Bill Gates: The Secret Santa disguised as a 'friendly fellow' on Reddit
- Obamacare 'pajamas boy' gets roundly mocked
- Duck Dynasty Phil Robertson suspended indefinitely for gay quip
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- U.S. Army mulls wiping out memory of Robert E. Lee, 'Stonewall' Jackson
- BOLTON: Nero in the White House
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Top 10 handguns in the U.S.
Extraordinary day at Redskins Park
White House pets gone wild!
Let it snow