- ‘Welcome to the edge of freedom’: Biden’s boots touch down in DMZ
- Obama: Hole U.S. ‘digging out of’ requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Obama’s regulatory agenda will cost U.S. economy $143B next year: report
- Patriot Act author on James Clapper: Fire, prosecute him
- Russia P.M. Medvedev: No amnesty for political prisoners
- Michigan GOP Senate hopeful reminds government is the ‘servant’
- Christmas, by Congress: Members mull a 15-cent tax on trees
- U.S. unemployment falls to five-year low of 7 percent; 203K jobs added
- World mourns Nelson Mandela and celebrates his life; burial set for Dec. 15
- Bill O’Reilly reminds: Nelson Mandela ‘was a communist’
Inside China: Security spending tops defense
For two years in a row, China will spend a huge portion of its annual budget on forces used to check growing social discontent and for protecting the communist regime from popular challenges. The official budget figure for internal security spending released this week highlights Beijing’s anxiety about mounting social unrest and its determined focus on countering it.
On Monday, the Chinese government made public this year’s spending plans. The amount slated for internal security will be boosted by 11.5 percent to $111 billion, larger than the much-talked-about Chinese defense budget that will jump by 11.2 percent to $106.4 billion.
China’s Leninist state legally defines “internal security” as zhuanzhengjiqi, or “dictatorship machines.” The actual constitutional expression of this internal security apparatus is, as the preamble to the country’s constitution states, “the People’s Democratic Dictatorship … in essence the dictatorship of the proletariat.”
These dictatorship machines include police, state security, armed police, labor camps and jails under the overall category of “public security.”
China’s economic and military expansions have surprised and alarmed many throughout the world. It also has come with volatile social discontent against the communist government that has been manifest in tens of thousands of demonstrations and other expressions of social unrest.
Official Chinese statistics report that in 1998 there were 8,700 cases of “mass incidents,” a euphemism for large-scale social and political protests and attacks against government policies and organizations; by 2010, the last time public figures were published, “mass incidents” in China topped 90,000, an increase of more than 1,000 percent.
But other areas in China are equally jittery about the possible explosion of the “Big One,” the one major outburst of unrest that could lead to the toppling of the communist regime.
WEATHER TALK IN BEIJING
The talk in Beijing this week is about high-level power struggles and corruption. Because no officials can speak openly about the most sensational political drama since Chinese military leader Lin Biao was accused of fomenting a coup in 1971 and the Gang of Four (including Mao Zedong’s widow) were arrested in yet another coup attempt in 1976, top leaders are resorting to talking about the weather in conveying subtle but important political messages to the nation.
For the past several days, thousands of “people’s delegates” from all provinces in China converged on Beijing for the annual National People’s Congress and the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Congress, two major Communist Party sessions.
But the focus of the nation’s attention remains on one particular delegate, Bo Xilai, the party boss from the southwest metropolis of Chongqing whose police chief, Wang Lijun, dramatically spent a night in the U.S. Consulate in Chengdu, where he reportedly sought political asylum but was turned away and given over to a senior official of Beijing’s Ministry of State Security, the civilian political police and intelligence service.
The most-junior and yet most-ambitious and flamboyant member of the ruling Politburo, Mr. Bo is widely reported to be maneuvering for a spot in the party’s core leadership group, the nine-member Standing Committee of the Politburo.
The Wang Lijun affair appears to have heavily damaged Mr. Bo’s political standing and thus his chances to reach that goal, most analysts say. But he surprisingly showed up at the Beijing conferences, leaving the entire nation at a loss as to what will happen next.
About the Author
Miles Yu’s column appears Thursdays. He can be reached at email@example.com.
- Obama: Hole U.S. 'digging out of' requires billions more in unemployment benefits
- Bill OReilly reminds: Nelson Mandela was a communist
- PRUDEN: British press horrified as London's new mayor dares to proclaim the truth
- Obama tries to calm Israeli fears over Iranian nuke deal 'not based on trust'
- 'Dude, I'm dreading that I will have to go': Czech prime minister on Mandela funeral
- EDITORIAL: Our ideological president
- Snow storm sucker punch: U.S. hit by winter wave
- Spike in battlefield deaths linked to restrictive rules of engagement
- Obamas call to close Vatican embassy is 'slap in the face' to Roman Catholics
- KEENE: Nelson Mandela's legacy
Independent voices from the The Washington Times Communities
Get in the middle of all the action inside and outside the boxing ring.
Opinion, analysis, and musings on politics, pop culture, reinvention, and the resultant flotsam and jetsam floating around the right-of-center quadrant of the Left Coast.
The cold hard truth about politics in America today and the state of this once great nation.
Find the latest news and happening that effect those in the Washington D.C., Northern Virginia and Maryland Metro region.
White House pets gone wild!