- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
Inside the Beltway: Enough already
The U.S. should stop “reflexively exploiting major national security threats as a political ping-pong ball between right and left,” says Zuhdi Jasser, president and founder of American Islamic Forum for Democracy. Forget the PR potential. Get down to business and start crafting a practical strategy to defeat the threat of Islamist militancy both at home and abroad, he says.
“In an election year, you’ve got the administration again basically saying ‘mission accomplished’ and that al Qaeda is done — which is absurd. With the ascent of Islamists like the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt, Ennhada in Tunisia and across the Middle East, we need to recognize what the long-term conflict is,” says Dr. Jasser, an Arizona-based physician and author who has tracked the growth of terror groups such as al-Shabab, Abu Sayyaf, Jemaah Islamiyah, the Haqqani network and 35 others.
“Al Qaeda may be a shell of what it was at 9/11, but Islamism is a hydra that is continually reshaping itself. The death of Osama bin Laden and even the defeat of al Qaeda will just give rise to many other groups unless the root causes of Islamism are addressed.”
“The issues are the same. We’re still faced with a tremendous crisis of our country’s future,” Newt Gingrich tells 180,000 donors and 2 million voters who supported him as he prepares to exit the presidential campaign trail Wednesday. But such talk is subject to interpretation. A brief review of news headlines heralding his decision:
“Gingrich to prolong spotlight in campaign suspension event” (Fox News), “Gingrich: thanks and goodbye” (CNN), “A Gingrich/Romney joint event a possibility” (U.S. News & World Report), “For Gingrich, forever’s gone away” (MSNBC); “Did Gingrich film video after Delaware?” (The Street), “Gingrich readies for next phase of his career” (Austin American-Statesman), “Gingrich ends in irrelevancy” (Bloomberg), “Newt’s long goodbye” (Slate).
The Libertarian Party is getting ready to rumble: Its convention gets under way Wednesday in Las Vegas, and the ticket is set. It’s Gary Johnson for president, running as “the anti-war candidate”. And he’s got a running mate now: James P. Gray, who idolizes economist Milton Friedman and bristles with legal credentials.
“I believe my background, experience and values will bring additional credibility and force to our team. I was an elected trial court judge for 25 years, federal prosecutor in Los Angeles, criminal defense attorney in the Navy JAG Corps, and Peace Corps volunteer in Costa Rica. I formerly held a top-secret clearance in the Navy, and was the recipient of National Defense, Vietnam Service and Combat Action awards while serving my country,” Mr. Gray says.
So this is how it all works: “The Tyranny of Cliches: How Liberals Cheat in the War of Ideas.” So says syndicated columnist Jonah Goldberg in the title of his new book. According to the author, the greatest trick liberals ever pulled was convincing themselves that they are not ideological.
“One mans terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter: Sure, if the other man is an idiot. Was Martin Luther King Jr. a terrorist? Was bin Laden a freedom fighter?” Mr. Goldberg says. “Violence never solves anything: Really? It solved our problems with the British Empire and ended slavery.”
The author has a million of ‘em.
“Better 10 guilty men go free than one innocent man suffer: So you won’t mind if those 10 guilty men move next door to you?” the author notes as another example, adding “We need complete separation of church and state: In other words all expressions of faith should be barred from politics — except when they support liberal programs.”
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
- Inside the Beltway: A sampler of CPAC wisdom
- Historian: Valdimir Putin using Peter the Great tactics
- Christine O'Donnell eager to re-engage in political debate
- Inside the Beltway: CPAC spectacle and a cast of thousands
- Inside the Beltway: Romney renaissance under way
Latest Blog Entries
- A startling 20 percent of Democratic lawmakers already endorse Hillary Clinton for president
- Hey food police: calling obesity a 'disease' is actually a health risk
- Cheese and an 'enhanced experience': White House goes showbiz on the State of the Union address
- Cruz calls it a 'circus': the State of the Union spectacle begins
- Half of American fans say God and 'supernatural' forces are in play during sports events
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- CPAC 2014: Rand Paul urges conservatives to fight for liberty
- Putin has transformed Russian army into a lean, mean fighting machine
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- EDITORIAL: Connecticut revolts against gun controls that could criminalize 300,000
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Aronofsky's 'Noah' banned in Qatar, Bahrain, United Arab Emirates
- Russia should be booted from FIFA World Cup, senators say
- PIPES: Islam's inadvertent adverse effects on adherents
- MILLER: Donald Trump says hes a Tea Party member
- Soldier who hid to avoid saluting the flag to be punished in secret; Army won't release details
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again