- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
City wants its form of Hatch Act to prevail
Says federal law limits candidates
The District's top attorney on Wednesday asked members of Congress to let the D.C. government rely on its own version of a federal law that polices public employees' participation in partisan politics, arguing the city is plagued by confusing applications of law.
D.C. Attorney General Irvin B. Nathan, an appointee of Mayor Vincent C. Gray, warned a House subcommittee that the federal version of the Hatch Act passed in 1939 would bar qualified candidates from running for his position in 2014, when city voters will choose their attorney general for the first time in a partisan election.
"Under the current Hatch Act, which treats all D.C. employees as federal executive branch officials, neither I nor any District employee or officeholder could run for the elected attorney general position," he testified in remarks as prepared for delivery. "And, of course, unless the law is changed, the person elected as attorney general in 2014 would have to resign the position in order to run for re-election."
The Hatch Act prohibits both federal and D.C. employees from running for partisan political office, collecting political contributions or hosting campaign fundraisers and from using any government resources for political activities.
Both chambers of Congress are considering bills that would allow employees in state or local governments to run in partisan elections, even if their positions are federally funded. They also would stop treating D.C. employees like full-fledged federal workers and treat them like employees of any other local government.
Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton, the District's nonvoting member of Congress, is championing the bills so the District can rely on a local version of the Hatch Act - the Prohibition on Government Employee Engagement in Political Activity Act of 2010. Following the District's version of the law would clear up confusion in enforcing the federal law, according to Mrs. Norton.
City officials point to advisory neighborhood commissioners as persons who are unjustly barred from partisan politics by the feds.
The commissioners, who are unpaid and elected in a nonpartisan fashion to represent D.C communities' interests, are barred from seeking higher office in partisan elections unless they resign. But Mr. Nathan said the U.S. Office of Special Counsel (OSC) - which enforces the act - is "unsure whether or how it can enforce this provision should an ANC member violate the law."
"By its action, or more accurately, its inaction, the OSC has made clear that it would prefer not to devote its limited resources to violations of this kind," he told the House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee on the federal workforce, U.S. Postal Service and labor policy. "This type of approach only breeds disrespect for the law, when it cannot be enforced with a straight face."
D.C. Council member Phil Mendelson, at-large Democrat and chairman of the Committee on the Judiciary, also wants to fix the "ridiculous situation" facing future candidates for D.C. attorney general.
On Tuesday, he asked his colleagues to include language in the city's fiscal 2013 Budget Request Act that urges Congress to amend the city's Home Rule Charter so that the election of attorneys general is no longer partisan.
"We can't have an election with a full array of candidates if we don't do this, because so many people will be disqualified by the Hatch Act," Mr. Mendelson said.
Mr. Mendelson could not get his colleagues to agree, however,
"It merits a full discussion and hearing, I think, before any change is made in this," council member Jim Graham, Ward 1 Democrat, said from the dais.
In rebuttal, Mr. Mendelson's office said the current dilemma was created when the council - at the last minute - decided to establish "partisan" contests for attorney general in debate on the legislation that made it an elected office.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
Tom Howell Jr. covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Russia should be booted from FIFA World Cup, senators say
- New tool helps figure Obamacare penalties
- Tax-prep firms pitch in, cash in on Obamacare
- Obama tries to reassure Hispanics on Obamacare
- Half of uninsured look to Obamacare exchanges for coverage
Latest Blog Entries
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- Senate Democrats, Republicans spar over restoring unemployment benefits
- 80 people publicly executed across North Korea for films, Bibles
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- CURL: The modern GOP really is Reagan's 'Big Tent' party
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Six Senate seats could hinge on Keystone pipeline
- Russias Putin nominated for Nobel Peace Prize
- CPAC 2014: Straw poll signals Paul-Cruz showdown
Pope Francis meets his 'mini-me'
Celebrity deaths in 2014
Winter storm hits states — again