- Obama not worried about Ebola at upcoming African summit in D.C.
- Obama: ‘We tortured some folks’ after 9/11
- Obama administration asked whole D.C. Circuit to take on major Obamacare case
- Mark Levin: Topple GOP leadership or country will ‘unravel’
- Massachusetts to let police chief deny gun buys to those deemed unfit
- John Kerry condemns attack on Israeli soldiers, kidnapping
- U.S. starts to evacuate American Ebola patients from West Africa: Report
- Geraldo slammed as ‘dummy’ for backing Clinton’s bin Laden claim
- Israeli spokesman: No need to debate who broke the cease-fire
- 35 Palestinians killed; Israeli officer missing
New Va. voter-ID law makes it ‘tough to cheat’
Question of the Day
With Gov. Bob McDonnell’s blessing, Virginia is the latest in a growing number of states that have adopted voter-identification laws ahead of the 2012 elections — though he managed to add a fairly significant twist.
The governor’s signature on a set of companion bills requiring voters to present one of a number of forms of ID at the polls pleased Republicans, who introduced the measures they say are meant to combat voter fraud.
“Virginia’s new voter-ID law makes it easy to vote, but tough to cheat,” said Sen. Mark D. Obenshain, Harrisonburg Republican, who co-sponsored the Senate version.
Mr. McDonnell also took the bold step of issuing an executive order directing the State Board of Elections to send new voter-registration cards to every active voter in the state, which could help blunt charges that the legislation is aimed at suppressing the vote of the poor and minorities — groups that traditionally vote Democratic and could help deliver the state to President Obama once again.
That move, however, is a costly one — to the tune of $1.36 million, according to Justin Riemer, deputy secretary for the State Board of Elections.
The expense did not go unnoticed by Senate Democratic Caucus Chairman A. Donald McEachin, Henrico Democrat, who was one of the leading opponents of the measures.
“In this economy, as we have too few dollars for education, public safety and transportation, we should not be wasting valued monies to suppress voting,” he said. “This is now a costly boondoggle and an affront to Virginians and the Constitution.”
But with controversy over the laws swirling around the country — the U.S. Department of Justice has already blocked legislation in South Carolina and Texas requiring a photo ID at the polls — the added precaution appears to be intended as a signal that Virginia is not actively trying to suppress any particular voting bloc.
All three states are subject to Section 5 of the 1965 Voting Rights Act because of a history of discrimination at the polls, and must “preclear” any changes in their voting laws with the federal government.
“For the citizens of the Commonwealth of Virginia to have faith in their government, they must have faith in their elections,” Mr. McDonnell wrote in his order. He acknowledged that potential burdens on eligible voters — including the elderly, poor, racial minorities, non-native English speakers and the disabled — must be taken into account. “All eligible voters regardless of income, race, age, and other factors should be able to have equal access to the electoral process and should be made aware of any changes that may impact their ability to vote.”
Currently, if voters do not have identification with them at the polls, they can simply sign a sworn affidavit saying they are who they say they are.
Under the law as passed, such a vote will be counted provisionally, and the voter will have to provide proper identification to their local electoral board within three days after the election for his or her vote to count.
The bill was also amended to expand the forms of identification of voter could use to include, for example, a bank statement or utility bill.
Mr. McDonnell offered amendments to the measure, including one that would have had electoral board members compare a voter’s signature to the one in their voter registration file to confirm their identity. The General Assembly, however, rejected it.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
David Sherfinski covers politics for The Washington Times. He can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
- Williams: First lady didn't discuss her relationship with husband
- Williams: Maureen McDonnell's high-dollar requests seemed excessive
- Trips, loans for McDonnell family detailed at trial
- Star witness in Bob McDonnell corruption trial refutes 'crush' defense
- Defense lawyer: McDonnell's wife had 'crush' on CEO
Latest Blog Entries
- Dick Cheney: Hillary Clinton 'clearly bears responsibility' on Benghazi
- Holder vows to press ahead on gun control fight
- Seven of 10 prefer that Obama work with Congress, not go around it: Poll
- Schumer: Tea party hasn't let Obama put his policies into effect
- GOP official: Black not running for Wolf's House seat
TWT Video Picks
By Orrin G. Hatch
Procedural changes impede the chamber's traditional deliberative function
- Border agents cleared of civil rights complaints from illegal immigrant children
- U.N. condemns Israel, U.S. for not sharing Iron Dome with Hamas
- Obama military strategy too weak for future security, panel reports
- Porn-surfing feds blame boredom, lack of work for misbehavior
- Ben Carson takes major step toward presidential campaign
- Feds raid S.C. home to seize Land Rover in EPA emission-control crackdown
- Ted Nugent slams 'lying freaks' at liberal media: I'm 'doing God's work'
- CRUZ: A tale of two hospitals: One in Israel, one in Gaza
- Report: 40% of weapons sent to Afghanistan are unaccounted for
- House backs faster deportations, cancels 'Dreamer' policy
Top 10 U.S. military helicopters
Obama's biggest White House 'fails'
Celebrities turned politicians
Athletes turned actors