- Gentlemen, start your drones: Judge’s ruling opens door for commercial use
- Soldier who hid, bragged about not saluting flag to be punished — in secret
- ‘Maverick’ of the seas: ‘Top Gun’ school for U.S. ship officers to launch
- Putin declares Sochi Paralympics open amid Ukrainian protest
- ‘In Jesus name, we pray’ sparks ire at Ohio council meeting
- Navy’s first laser weapon ready for prime time; drone killer to deploy this summer
- Billionaire backer: Rick Santorum ‘needs to be heard’ in 2016
- Obamacare fallout: 49 percent pessimistic; 45 percent ‘scared’
- DHS accused of holding U.S. citizen at airport, using emails to pry into her sex life
- Seattle socialist: Minimum-wage discussion skewed by ‘right-wing’ GAO analysis
LAMBRO: Opening the door to a fiscal deal
Obama and Boehner talk compromise
Before the election ballots were fully counted last week, equity markets were sending President Obama a blunt vote of no confidence.
Forget all the political pundits who were heralding his narrow popular vote victory as a mandate for his soak-the-rich tax agenda. The sour message from the investment community that fuels our economy spoke volumes about a fundamentally status quo election.
The capital markets, stricken by uncertainty and sitting on nearly $2 trillion in cash, fear the weak, subpar, jobless Obama economy isn’t going to be significantly different in a second term than it was in his first.
That realization triggered last week’s postelection sell-off on Wall Street. The Dow Jones industrial average of blue chip stocks plunged nearly 400 points, the sharpest weekly decline in more than five months.
This week’s economic data for October were not expected to improve Wall Street’s bearish mood, either. Producer prices were expected to decline along with retail sales. Industrial output was forecast to slip, contrary to the president’s campaign TV ads that said U.S. “factories were humming.” Unemployment claims were likely to rise, too.
It was an inauspicious “new beginning” for the Obama administration, despite a week when the president and House Speaker John A. Boehner appeared to be ready to cut a year-end deal on spending cuts and tax revenues in the lame-duck Congress.
Appearances can be deceiving, especially when the positions on both sides are reinterpreted by the nightly network news shows, where they don’t know the difference between income “tax revenues” and income “tax rates.”
Mr. Obama and his fiscal nemesis, Mr. Boehner, quickly set out their markers last week as they plotted strategies for this Friday’s high-stakes meeting to prevent the economy from tumbling over the so-called “fiscal cliff” on Jan. 1. That’s when all of the Bush tax cuts and payroll-tax cuts will expire, raising everyone’s taxes in the new year, along with a mountain of automatic spending cuts that will deal a massive blow to a sluggish, high-unemployment economy. If both sides can’t agree on a way to prevent this calamity, the Congressional Budget Office says the result will be the elimination of 1.8 million jobs.
Mr. Boehner was the first to open the door to a deal, saying Republicans were “willing to accept new revenues,” but not by raising tax rates on the two top income brackets as Mr. Obama demanded in his first four years. That would push the highest tax rate to more than 40 percent.
With Republicans in firm control of the House, where the Constitution says all revenue bills must originate, that is never going to happen.
“Raising tax rates is unacceptable,” Mr. Boehner said last week in a postelection news conference. “Increased tax rates will destroy jobs in America by hurting small businesses across the country.”
While you never hear this on the nightly network news, Republican leaders want to follow the tax reform outline set forth by the two top leaders of Mr. Obama’s deficit-cutting commission, which offered bipartisan proposals he ignored and shelved in his first term.
That commission, co-chaired by former President Bill Clinton’s chief of staff, Erskine Bowles, called for cleansing the cluttered tax code of corporate welfare, including other deductions, exemptions, credits, loopholes and assorted special-interest tax breaks.
This would bring more federal revenue into the Treasury to help reduce the deficit, allowing Congress to lower the tax rates to boost economic growth, accelerate job creation to bring down unemployment, and unlock capital investment for new business expansion.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
About the Author
TWT Video Picks
Taxpayers must pay the freight for over-budget train projects
Get Breaking Alerts
- Kim Jong-un calls for execution of 33 Christians
- Rand Paul wins 2014 CPAC straw poll, Ted Cruz finishes a distant second
- SAUERBREY: Taxing Marylanders until they flee
- 'Blarney Blowout' near UMass results in 73 arrests; 4 officers injured
- Bill Clinton cashes in on struggling nonprofit hospital
- Bill Clinton poses for photo with Bunny Ranch prostitutes
- Vietnam says it may have found door of missing Malaysian jet as intel look into stolen passports
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- CPAC 2014 straw poll results
- Obama engages in Ukraine diplomacy from Fla. resort as Russia digs in
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Time for feckless president to show resolve
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama reserves 'Chicago way' for GOP
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Public education would wither in free market
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Turkey not committed to Cyprus peace
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Spoiled-kid culture creates greedy adults