- Donald Rumsfeld has ‘no idea’ if he paid taxes correctly
- Bradley Manning named honorary grand marshal of San Francisco Pride parade
- Look out PayPal: Facebook working toward mobile payments system
- U.S. rebukes Iran’s U.N. envoy pick over 1979 embassy attack
- Stoned mom avoids jail after driving 12 miles with baby on roof
- More than 100 ‘inappropriate’ encounters between NYC school staffers, students since 2009: report
- Joe Biden to Boston bombing survivors: ‘America will never, ever stand down’
- FBI failed to throughly vet Boston bombing suspect after Russian lead, report finds
- Atlanta Braves flooded with Hank Aaron hate mail: He’s a ‘scumbag’
- University: Help, our campus is too white
LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Still refusing to take responsibility
On Wednesday morning, viewers of TV news saw a bevy of politicians demanding congressional hearings on the deadly assault on the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi, Libya, so that preventative measures could be taken and "this never happens again."
That's all well and good, but I for one would like some direct answers from our commander in chief as to why and how the Benghazi killings were allowed to happen in the first place. It is not the "fog of war" that obscured this battle, it is the redolent smoke screen generated by White House politics that stings America's eyes and makes us so nauseous.
During the month preceding the attack this Sept. 11, did President Obama ever take any direct briefings on the developing Libyan situation from the intelligence community? If the president wasn't in the loop on such a hot-button foreign policy issue, why wasn't he? Failing that, did he read any indications and warning notices or other threat assessments from Ambassador J. Christopher Stevens' mission that landed on his Oval Office desk? If such critical traffic did indeed reach Mr. Obama's desk in the midst of his presidential campaign, did he exercise due diligence and take the time to fully read it before it became stale news?
While Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was the first to stand up on the burning quarterdeck of our savaged ship of state and accept responsibility, it was an insincere gesture, as she was only the helmsman, carrying out her captain's steering directions. Accepting responsibility without any attendant consequences has become the fashionable thing for our political leaders to do here in America. There was a time in history when leaders of events that came to no good end knew full well that when they stood up and accepted responsibility for the carnage of their actions, there was going to be hell to pay in their immediate future.
© Copyright 2014 The Washington Times, LLC. Click here for reprint permission.
TWT Video Picks
By returning to goodness, the nation can achieve greatness once again
Get Breaking Alerts
- Fuel-filled wings, ability to swarm: Pentagon offers glimpse at future of drone fleet
- Secret U.S. assessments show Afghanistan not ready to govern on own
- U.S. military on high alert as Ukraine troops trade gunfire with pro-Russian militants
- Russian fighter jet buzzes U.S. Navy destroyer in Black Sea
- Nevada Bundy ranch standoff could leave dirt on Harry Reid reputation
- U.S. Navy to turn seawater into jet fuel
- 'Culture of intimidation' seen in Nevada ranch standoff
- U.S. pilot scares off Iranians with 'Top Gun'-worthy stunt: 'You really ought to go home'
- Donald Rumsfeld has 'no idea' if he paid taxes correctly
- Wal-Mart forced to apologize for 'mistake' favoring English-speaking shoppers
Recent Letters to the Editor
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Solution to Cyprus dispute is no 'mistake'
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obama's real wealth redistribution scheme
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Obamacare numbers nothing to celebrate
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Unanswered bus-crash questions
- LETTER TO THE EDITOR: Lerner won't face meaningful punishment